Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values
Abstract In response to mounting wildfire risks, land managers across the country will need to dramatically increase proactive wildfire management (e.g. fuel and forest health treatments). While human communities vary widely in their vulnerability to the impacts of fire, these discrepancies have rar...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | People and Nature |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10733 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832591089577492480 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Mae Lacey Justin P. Suraci Caitlin E. Littlefield Blake S. Busse Brett G. Dickson |
| author_facet | L. Mae Lacey Justin P. Suraci Caitlin E. Littlefield Blake S. Busse Brett G. Dickson |
| author_sort | L. Mae Lacey |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract In response to mounting wildfire risks, land managers across the country will need to dramatically increase proactive wildfire management (e.g. fuel and forest health treatments). While human communities vary widely in their vulnerability to the impacts of fire, these discrepancies have rarely informed prioritizations for wildfire mitigation treatments. The ecological values and ecosystem services provided by forests have also typically been secondary considerations. To identify locations across the conterminous US where proactive wildfire management is likely to be effective at reducing wildfire severity and to yield co‐benefits for vulnerable communities and ecological values, we developed a set of spatial models that estimated wildfire mitigation potential (based on wildfire hazard and biophysical forest conditions) and either included or excluded information on vulnerable human communities, ecological values and ecosystem services. We then compared areas with high wildfire mitigation potential alone to refined ‘focal areas’ that overlaid social and ecological considerations to quantify the potential benefits of targeted wildfire mitigation treatments. Inclusion of social and ecological considerations substantially increased representation of vulnerable communities and ecological values in focal areas relative to the model that considered wildfire alone. For instance, restoration in these refined focal areas would cover 28% greater imperilled species richness, 45% greater water importance and 26% more families falling below the poverty line. By examining overlap between our refined focal areas and U.S. Forest Service top ranked firesheds (a prominent existing wildfire prioritization scheme), we show that our analysis can help to target wildfire mitigation efforts within firesheds to areas with particularly high social vulnerability and/or ecological value, providing an important compliment to a prioritization scheme based largely on risk to structures. Our results highlight the importance of considering ecological and social factors when implementing wildfire mitigation treatments and provide actionable guidance for integrating these considerations into existing prioritizations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-41d0cef533a94eaeabb171b465a0fbc2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2575-8314 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | People and Nature |
| spelling | doaj-art-41d0cef533a94eaeabb171b465a0fbc22025-01-23T04:04:08ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142025-01-0171526610.1002/pan3.10733Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological valuesL. Mae Lacey0Justin P. Suraci1Caitlin E. Littlefield2Blake S. Busse3Brett G. Dickson4Conservation Science Partners, Inc. Truckee California USAConservation Science Partners, Inc. Truckee California USAConservation Science Partners, Inc. Truckee California USAThe Pew Charitable Trusts Washington District of Colombia USAConservation Science Partners, Inc. Truckee California USAAbstract In response to mounting wildfire risks, land managers across the country will need to dramatically increase proactive wildfire management (e.g. fuel and forest health treatments). While human communities vary widely in their vulnerability to the impacts of fire, these discrepancies have rarely informed prioritizations for wildfire mitigation treatments. The ecological values and ecosystem services provided by forests have also typically been secondary considerations. To identify locations across the conterminous US where proactive wildfire management is likely to be effective at reducing wildfire severity and to yield co‐benefits for vulnerable communities and ecological values, we developed a set of spatial models that estimated wildfire mitigation potential (based on wildfire hazard and biophysical forest conditions) and either included or excluded information on vulnerable human communities, ecological values and ecosystem services. We then compared areas with high wildfire mitigation potential alone to refined ‘focal areas’ that overlaid social and ecological considerations to quantify the potential benefits of targeted wildfire mitigation treatments. Inclusion of social and ecological considerations substantially increased representation of vulnerable communities and ecological values in focal areas relative to the model that considered wildfire alone. For instance, restoration in these refined focal areas would cover 28% greater imperilled species richness, 45% greater water importance and 26% more families falling below the poverty line. By examining overlap between our refined focal areas and U.S. Forest Service top ranked firesheds (a prominent existing wildfire prioritization scheme), we show that our analysis can help to target wildfire mitigation efforts within firesheds to areas with particularly high social vulnerability and/or ecological value, providing an important compliment to a prioritization scheme based largely on risk to structures. Our results highlight the importance of considering ecological and social factors when implementing wildfire mitigation treatments and provide actionable guidance for integrating these considerations into existing prioritizations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10733ecosystem servicesfire ecologyfuel treatmentslandscape planningrestorationsocial vulnerability |
| spellingShingle | L. Mae Lacey Justin P. Suraci Caitlin E. Littlefield Blake S. Busse Brett G. Dickson Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values People and Nature ecosystem services fire ecology fuel treatments landscape planning restoration social vulnerability |
| title | Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| title_full | Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| title_fullStr | Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| title_full_unstemmed | Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| title_short | Informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| title_sort | informing proactive wildfire management that benefits vulnerable communities and ecological values |
| topic | ecosystem services fire ecology fuel treatments landscape planning restoration social vulnerability |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10733 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lmaelacey informingproactivewildfiremanagementthatbenefitsvulnerablecommunitiesandecologicalvalues AT justinpsuraci informingproactivewildfiremanagementthatbenefitsvulnerablecommunitiesandecologicalvalues AT caitlinelittlefield informingproactivewildfiremanagementthatbenefitsvulnerablecommunitiesandecologicalvalues AT blakesbusse informingproactivewildfiremanagementthatbenefitsvulnerablecommunitiesandecologicalvalues AT brettgdickson informingproactivewildfiremanagementthatbenefitsvulnerablecommunitiesandecologicalvalues |