An exploratory qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures and disease-modifying therapies in adults with spinal muscular atrophy

Objective: To understand patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures, critical functional domains, and disease-modifying therapies in adult spinal muscular atrophy. Design: An exploratory qualitative single-site study. Patients: Ten adults with spinal muscul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Slayter, Lauren Casey, Shane McCullum, Dorothy Drost, Allison Banks, Colleen O'Connell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/41254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To understand patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures, critical functional domains, and disease-modifying therapies in adult spinal muscular atrophy. Design: An exploratory qualitative single-site study. Patients: Ten adults with spinal muscular atrophy and two clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually or in person with participants after they completed outcome measures at a routine clinic visit. Two researchers analysed transcripts concurrently using a thematic approach to determine themes. Results: Ten themes were identified among partici-pants. Patient-reported outcome measure preference varied between functional groups and was under-responsive, although it captured meaningful data. Motor stability was most frequently expected with disease-modifying therapy, but participants also reported improved fatigue and respiratory status. Conclusion: After considering patient goals, functional status, and preferences, patient-reported outcome measures represent a valuable adjunct to standard clinical and research tools. Optimal selection of patient-reported outcome measures requires careful consideration of multiple patient factors. Collaborative development of modified patient-reported outcome measures may yield a responsive, meaningful, and acceptable tool that can be used across a broad functional spectrum.
ISSN:1651-2081