Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”

The article is dedicated to strategies and tactics of engaging with the ‘Soviet text’ in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”. It identifies that the conceptual sphere of the Soviet era, as represented in the poem, was formed as a system of ‘frames’, consisting of constant and variable com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lyubov G. Kihney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2024-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/viewFile/41907/24144
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850103814794772480
author Lyubov G. Kihney
author_facet Lyubov G. Kihney
author_sort Lyubov G. Kihney
collection DOAJ
description The article is dedicated to strategies and tactics of engaging with the ‘Soviet text’ in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”. It identifies that the conceptual sphere of the Soviet era, as represented in the poem, was formed as a system of ‘frames’, consisting of constant and variable components. The work proves that the invariant aspects are implemented at the level of composition, while the variable ones are connected with themes and images of contents of the frames. A detailed analysis of semantic structure of the poem allowed for identification of the main principles of construction of the frames as a series of intertextual references, to songs in particular, forming the semantic field of Kibirov’s poem. The study consistently reveals and describes all the components of these frames, concluding that they are connected with ideological mythology of the Soviet era represented in the Soviet life and art of corresponding periods. Additionally, the research locates Kibirov’s position on the axis of tradition, demonstrating his complex relationship with conceptualism (indicated at the level of framework of the text). The main proposition of the article is to demonstrate Kibirov’s ambivalent view on the ideology and propaganda projects of the Soviet period. It proves that Kibirov was the first to employ the method of ‘double perspective’ on Soviet ideologemes, balancing between ironic detachment and personal involvement in the worldview context of the age.
format Article
id doaj-art-418e2d9ddc124ea38ed7c310f01d6b8b
institution DOAJ
issn 2312-9220
2312-9247
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism
spelling doaj-art-418e2d9ddc124ea38ed7c310f01d6b8b2025-08-20T02:39:28ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism2312-92202312-92472024-12-0129345046210.22363/2312-9220-2024-29-3-450-46221071Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”Lyubov G. Kihney0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0342-7125Yaroslavl State Pedagogical UniversityThe article is dedicated to strategies and tactics of engaging with the ‘Soviet text’ in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”. It identifies that the conceptual sphere of the Soviet era, as represented in the poem, was formed as a system of ‘frames’, consisting of constant and variable components. The work proves that the invariant aspects are implemented at the level of composition, while the variable ones are connected with themes and images of contents of the frames. A detailed analysis of semantic structure of the poem allowed for identification of the main principles of construction of the frames as a series of intertextual references, to songs in particular, forming the semantic field of Kibirov’s poem. The study consistently reveals and describes all the components of these frames, concluding that they are connected with ideological mythology of the Soviet era represented in the Soviet life and art of corresponding periods. Additionally, the research locates Kibirov’s position on the axis of tradition, demonstrating his complex relationship with conceptualism (indicated at the level of framework of the text). The main proposition of the article is to demonstrate Kibirov’s ambivalent view on the ideology and propaganda projects of the Soviet period. It proves that Kibirov was the first to employ the method of ‘double perspective’ on Soviet ideologemes, balancing between ironic detachment and personal involvement in the worldview context of the age.https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/viewFile/41907/24144conceptualismsociocultural framesideologemesoviet historyreception mechanism
spellingShingle Lyubov G. Kihney
Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism
conceptualism
sociocultural frames
ideologeme
soviet history
reception mechanism
title Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
title_full Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
title_fullStr Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
title_full_unstemmed Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
title_short Deconstruction/reconstruction of Soviet myth in T. Kibirov’s poem “Love, Komsomol, and Spring”
title_sort deconstruction reconstruction of soviet myth in t kibirov s poem love komsomol and spring
topic conceptualism
sociocultural frames
ideologeme
soviet history
reception mechanism
url https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/viewFile/41907/24144
work_keys_str_mv AT lyubovgkihney deconstructionreconstructionofsovietmythintkibirovspoemlovekomsomolandspring