Reply to Yu and Zenker

Abstract: Yu and Zenker (2022) argue that the oft-made distinction between convergent and linked argument structure is problematic. If their account holds, the linked/convergent distinction, at least as I have characterized it (Freeman 2011), seems to violate the dictum that structural analysis sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Freeman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2025-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554174050828288
author James Freeman
author_facet James Freeman
author_sort James Freeman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: Yu and Zenker (2022) argue that the oft-made distinction between convergent and linked argument structure is problematic. If their account holds, the linked/convergent distinction, at least as I have characterized it (Freeman 2011), seems to violate the dictum that structural analysis should come before evaluation. In this Reply I defend the position that we do not need to estimate or determine argument strength to determine whether the premises of an argument are linked or convergent.   Résumé: Yu et Zenker (2022) soutiennent que la distinction souvent faite entre structure d’argumentation convergente et structure d’argumentation liée est problématique. Si leur explication est valable, la distinction liée/convergente, du moins telle que je l’ai caractérisée (Freeman 2011), semble violer le dicton selon lequel l’analyse structurelle doit précéder l’évaluation. Dans cette réponse, je défends la position selon laquelle nous n’avons pas besoin d’estimer ou de déterminer la force de l’argument pour déterminer si les prémisses d’un argument sont liées ou convergentes.
format Article
id doaj-art-4189179987884a6b8b6e7f3e050287fd
institution Kabale University
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj-art-4189179987884a6b8b6e7f3e050287fd2025-01-08T18:00:04ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2025-01-0144410.22329/il.v44i4.8792Reply to Yu and ZenkerJames Freeman0City College of New York Abstract: Yu and Zenker (2022) argue that the oft-made distinction between convergent and linked argument structure is problematic. If their account holds, the linked/convergent distinction, at least as I have characterized it (Freeman 2011), seems to violate the dictum that structural analysis should come before evaluation. In this Reply I defend the position that we do not need to estimate or determine argument strength to determine whether the premises of an argument are linked or convergent.   Résumé: Yu et Zenker (2022) soutiennent que la distinction souvent faite entre structure d’argumentation convergente et structure d’argumentation liée est problématique. Si leur explication est valable, la distinction liée/convergente, du moins telle que je l’ai caractérisée (Freeman 2011), semble violer le dicton selon lequel l’analyse structurelle doit précéder l’évaluation. Dans cette réponse, je défends la position selon laquelle nous n’avons pas besoin d’estimer ou de déterminer la force de l’argument pour déterminer si les prémisses d’un argument sont liées ou convergentes. https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8792argument structureconvergentlinkedrelevance
spellingShingle James Freeman
Reply to Yu and Zenker
Informal Logic
argument structure
convergent
linked
relevance
title Reply to Yu and Zenker
title_full Reply to Yu and Zenker
title_fullStr Reply to Yu and Zenker
title_full_unstemmed Reply to Yu and Zenker
title_short Reply to Yu and Zenker
title_sort reply to yu and zenker
topic argument structure
convergent
linked
relevance
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8792
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesfreeman replytoyuandzenker