Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm

Background/objectives: We aimed to evaluate the reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) despite being considered suboptimal candidates due to tumor size > 2 cm with or without lymph node metastasis. Methods: Between September 2008 and Novemb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiarash Bahrehmand, Dóra Vesztergom, Barna Budai, Dániel Lengyel, Edina Lukács, Zoltán Novák
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500013X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206863102214144
author Kiarash Bahrehmand
Dóra Vesztergom
Barna Budai
Dániel Lengyel
Edina Lukács
Zoltán Novák
author_facet Kiarash Bahrehmand
Dóra Vesztergom
Barna Budai
Dániel Lengyel
Edina Lukács
Zoltán Novák
author_sort Kiarash Bahrehmand
collection DOAJ
description Background/objectives: We aimed to evaluate the reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) despite being considered suboptimal candidates due to tumor size > 2 cm with or without lymph node metastasis. Methods: Between September 2008 and November 2021, 120 patients with early-stage cervical cancer patients who wished to preserve their fertility, were treated in our center. Out of these, 18 patients were not optimal candidates for FSS according to current guidelines. Despite our proposed radical treatment, these patients insisted on having a fertility-sparing treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the reproductive outcomes including the method of conception, postoperative pregnancy rate, fertility preservation rate, live birth rate, and preterm delivery rate, while the secondary objective was to evaluate 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: Out of 18 patients, 5 had lymph node metastasis and 2 of them declined adjuvant chemoradiation. Fertility sparing treatment was successful in 14/18 (77.8 %) patients. Out of the 14, 64.3 % (9/14) tried to conceive, resulting in 2 successful deliveries after in vitro fertilization resulting a live birth rate of 22.2. After a median follow-up of 143.3 months (95 % CI 66–169), the 5-year DFS and OS were 83.3 % (66.1–100) and 93.3 % (80.7–100), respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights the possibility of FSS in patients with suboptimal tumor characteristics for fertility preservation while providing acceptable oncologic outcomes. We found that classical barriers to FSS can be challenged, balancing fertility preservation and oncological outcomes, and argue for personalized approaches to cervical cancer treatment, respecting patient priorities. Further prospective studies are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of such approaches.
format Article
id doaj-art-415f54f964d74190850cc04189cd4f2d
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-5789
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
spelling doaj-art-415f54f964d74190850cc04189cd4f2d2025-02-07T04:47:50ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892025-02-0157101688Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cmKiarash Bahrehmand0Dóra Vesztergom1Barna Budai2Dániel Lengyel3Edina Lukács4Zoltán Novák5Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Corresponding author at: National Institute of Oncology, Ráth Gy. u. 7-9, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryDepartment of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, HungaryDepartment of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryDepartment of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, HungaryDepartment of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, HungaryBackground/objectives: We aimed to evaluate the reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) despite being considered suboptimal candidates due to tumor size > 2 cm with or without lymph node metastasis. Methods: Between September 2008 and November 2021, 120 patients with early-stage cervical cancer patients who wished to preserve their fertility, were treated in our center. Out of these, 18 patients were not optimal candidates for FSS according to current guidelines. Despite our proposed radical treatment, these patients insisted on having a fertility-sparing treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the reproductive outcomes including the method of conception, postoperative pregnancy rate, fertility preservation rate, live birth rate, and preterm delivery rate, while the secondary objective was to evaluate 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: Out of 18 patients, 5 had lymph node metastasis and 2 of them declined adjuvant chemoradiation. Fertility sparing treatment was successful in 14/18 (77.8 %) patients. Out of the 14, 64.3 % (9/14) tried to conceive, resulting in 2 successful deliveries after in vitro fertilization resulting a live birth rate of 22.2. After a median follow-up of 143.3 months (95 % CI 66–169), the 5-year DFS and OS were 83.3 % (66.1–100) and 93.3 % (80.7–100), respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights the possibility of FSS in patients with suboptimal tumor characteristics for fertility preservation while providing acceptable oncologic outcomes. We found that classical barriers to FSS can be challenged, balancing fertility preservation and oncological outcomes, and argue for personalized approaches to cervical cancer treatment, respecting patient priorities. Further prospective studies are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of such approaches.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500013XCervical cancerFertility-sparing surgeryRadical trachelectomyLymph node metastasisIn vitro fertilization
spellingShingle Kiarash Bahrehmand
Dóra Vesztergom
Barna Budai
Dániel Lengyel
Edina Lukács
Zoltán Novák
Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Cervical cancer
Fertility-sparing surgery
Radical trachelectomy
Lymph node metastasis
In vitro fertilization
title Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
title_full Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
title_fullStr Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
title_short Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm
title_sort evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor 2 cm
topic Cervical cancer
Fertility-sparing surgery
Radical trachelectomy
Lymph node metastasis
In vitro fertilization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500013X
work_keys_str_mv AT kiarashbahrehmand evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm
AT doravesztergom evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm
AT barnabudai evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm
AT daniellengyel evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm
AT edinalukacs evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm
AT zoltannovak evaluationofreproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesafterfertilitysparingsurgeryincervicalcancerpatientswithtumor2cm