O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy

The key dissents on the estimation of environmental pollution between some humanists, ecophilosophers, especially devotees of deep ecology and its mass media supporters, and experimental scientists chiefly chemists and toxicologists are presented by a discussion of the most important problems: human...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Konrad Gałuszko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2003-12-01
Series:Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6806
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832573541402279936
author Konrad Gałuszko
author_facet Konrad Gałuszko
author_sort Konrad Gałuszko
collection DOAJ
description The key dissents on the estimation of environmental pollution between some humanists, ecophilosophers, especially devotees of deep ecology and its mass media supporters, and experimental scientists chiefly chemists and toxicologists are presented by a discussion of the most important problems: human health risk from food and nutrition, the expansion of new biological agents (pathogens), fears of chemical and physical agents stimulated opinions of toxicologists (ecotoxicologists) about most of the compounds for food preservation, antioxidants, pesticides, engine fuel components, metals. Subsequently to the above were discussed: the criticism of some misconceptions and the evolution of scientists. opinions about derivations of the greenhouse effect, toxicity and carcinogenesis criteria, evidence supporting the threshold dose versus the linear hypothesis at the evaluation of harmful environmental effects, examples of ecological utopia assuming a possibility of “life in the world without toxins”, the consequences of acts of law created with the idea, untrustworthy examples of alleged hazards, Poland’s law delay with the assimilation of the new toxicological and carcinogenesis evidence, DDT application dilemma concerned with the latter, the acceptance of the threshold dose also for radioactivity, the latest news about ravages of the Chernobyl catastrophe, the author’s belief in better cooperation of humanists, ecophilosophers, scientists and mass media people to create sensible social attitudes of the public in the face of the ecological and civilization crisis.
format Article
id doaj-art-40f1c401a2f048a6bc30ca1659ba1c97
institution Kabale University
issn 1733-1218
language English
publishDate 2003-12-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
spelling doaj-art-40f1c401a2f048a6bc30ca1659ba1c972025-02-02T03:46:45ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182003-12-011110.21697/seb.2003.1.1.18O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawyKonrad Gałuszko0Instytut Ekologii i Bioetyki, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie,The key dissents on the estimation of environmental pollution between some humanists, ecophilosophers, especially devotees of deep ecology and its mass media supporters, and experimental scientists chiefly chemists and toxicologists are presented by a discussion of the most important problems: human health risk from food and nutrition, the expansion of new biological agents (pathogens), fears of chemical and physical agents stimulated opinions of toxicologists (ecotoxicologists) about most of the compounds for food preservation, antioxidants, pesticides, engine fuel components, metals. Subsequently to the above were discussed: the criticism of some misconceptions and the evolution of scientists. opinions about derivations of the greenhouse effect, toxicity and carcinogenesis criteria, evidence supporting the threshold dose versus the linear hypothesis at the evaluation of harmful environmental effects, examples of ecological utopia assuming a possibility of “life in the world without toxins”, the consequences of acts of law created with the idea, untrustworthy examples of alleged hazards, Poland’s law delay with the assimilation of the new toxicological and carcinogenesis evidence, DDT application dilemma concerned with the latter, the acceptance of the threshold dose also for radioactivity, the latest news about ravages of the Chernobyl catastrophe, the author’s belief in better cooperation of humanists, ecophilosophers, scientists and mass media people to create sensible social attitudes of the public in the face of the ecological and civilization crisis.https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6806zagrożenia środowiskaochrona środowiska
spellingShingle Konrad Gałuszko
O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
zagrożenia środowiska
ochrona środowiska
title O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
title_full O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
title_fullStr O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
title_full_unstemmed O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
title_short O istotnych kontrowersjach wokół oceny zagrożeń środowiska i jego naprawy
title_sort o istotnych kontrowersjach wokol oceny zagrozen srodowiska i jego naprawy
topic zagrożenia środowiska
ochrona środowiska
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6806
work_keys_str_mv AT konradgałuszko oistotnychkontrowersjachwokołocenyzagrozensrodowiskaijegonaprawy