Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction
Due to the characteristics of soft soil foundations in port engineering construction, there is a problem of insufficient bearing capacity, which needs to be treated. This paper analyzes the construction process and key points of the dynamic compaction method, vacuum preloading method, and vibroflota...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6442750 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850218169755500544 |
|---|---|
| author | Qiang Ren |
| author_facet | Qiang Ren |
| author_sort | Qiang Ren |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Due to the characteristics of soft soil foundations in port engineering construction, there is a problem of insufficient bearing capacity, which needs to be treated. This paper analyzes the construction process and key points of the dynamic compaction method, vacuum preloading method, and vibroflotation method, and expounds on the advantages and disadvantages. The cost of different methods is compared. It can be seen that compared with other methods, the vibration impact method has a simple construction process and low cost. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-40eb48e706994952ab6cfcb1d8324cb3 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1687-8094 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-40eb48e706994952ab6cfcb1d8324cb32025-08-20T02:07:51ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6442750Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port ConstructionQiang Ren0Department of Engineering ManagementDue to the characteristics of soft soil foundations in port engineering construction, there is a problem of insufficient bearing capacity, which needs to be treated. This paper analyzes the construction process and key points of the dynamic compaction method, vacuum preloading method, and vibroflotation method, and expounds on the advantages and disadvantages. The cost of different methods is compared. It can be seen that compared with other methods, the vibration impact method has a simple construction process and low cost.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6442750 |
| spellingShingle | Qiang Ren Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction Advances in Civil Engineering |
| title | Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction |
| title_full | Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction |
| title_fullStr | Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction |
| title_short | Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction |
| title_sort | comparison and cost analysis of soft soil foundation treatment schemes in port construction |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6442750 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT qiangren comparisonandcostanalysisofsoftsoilfoundationtreatmentschemesinportconstruction |