Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals
This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the TecnoBody D-Wall system in assessing joint range of motion (ROM) during overhead squat movements in healthy individuals, using Kinovea as a reference tool for data comparison. A total of 29 participants (16 males, 13 females) with a mean age o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Life |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/80 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832588123157037056 |
|---|---|
| author | Caglar Soylu Gorkem Acar Berkay Uzumcu Pervin Demir Sinan Seyhan Turker Biyikli |
| author_facet | Caglar Soylu Gorkem Acar Berkay Uzumcu Pervin Demir Sinan Seyhan Turker Biyikli |
| author_sort | Caglar Soylu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the TecnoBody D-Wall system in assessing joint range of motion (ROM) during overhead squat movements in healthy individuals, using Kinovea as a reference tool for data comparison. A total of 29 participants (16 males, 13 females) with a mean age of 28.41 ± 6.66 years were included. Measurements were conducted for hip and knee joint angles in the sagittal plane, with three repetitions per participant analyzed using both systems. The D-Wall system employed a 3D Kinect V2 camera and force platform, while Kinovea used 2D video-based motion analysis. The results demonstrated excellent agreement between the two systems, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.79 to 0.99. For the knee joint, the test-retest ICC values were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) for the D-Wall on the right side, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79–0.94) for the D-Wall on the left side. For the hip joint, test-retest ICC values were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97) for the D-Wall on the right side, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–0.97) for the D-Wall on the left side. Bland–Altman plots confirmed good agreement, with no significant systematic bias observed. Both systems showed statistically insignificant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05) between measurements, and correlation values ranged from 0.83 to 0.99, indicating strong associations. These findings highlight the high validity and reliability of both TecnoBody D-Wall and Kinovea systems in measuring joint angles during dynamic movements. The comparable accuracy between systems suggests that either system can be effectively utilized in clinical or research settings, depending on specific needs and resource availability. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-40e41289ce92438eae8339d0f3697ddb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2075-1729 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Life |
| spelling | doaj-art-40e41289ce92438eae8339d0f3697ddb2025-01-24T13:38:42ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292025-01-011518010.3390/life15010080Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy IndividualsCaglar Soylu0Gorkem Acar1Berkay Uzumcu2Pervin Demir3Sinan Seyhan4Turker Biyikli5Gulhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Sport Science, Institute of Graduate Education, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45040 Manisa, TurkeyBerton Robotic Technology and Health Inc., 34720 Istanbul, TurkeyBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 06145 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45040 Manisa, TurkeyDepartment of Coaching Education, Marmara University Faculty of Sport Sciences, 34815 Istanbul, TurkeyThis study evaluated the validity and reliability of the TecnoBody D-Wall system in assessing joint range of motion (ROM) during overhead squat movements in healthy individuals, using Kinovea as a reference tool for data comparison. A total of 29 participants (16 males, 13 females) with a mean age of 28.41 ± 6.66 years were included. Measurements were conducted for hip and knee joint angles in the sagittal plane, with three repetitions per participant analyzed using both systems. The D-Wall system employed a 3D Kinect V2 camera and force platform, while Kinovea used 2D video-based motion analysis. The results demonstrated excellent agreement between the two systems, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.79 to 0.99. For the knee joint, the test-retest ICC values were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) for the D-Wall on the right side, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79–0.94) for the D-Wall on the left side. For the hip joint, test-retest ICC values were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97) for the D-Wall on the right side, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) for Kinovea and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–0.97) for the D-Wall on the left side. Bland–Altman plots confirmed good agreement, with no significant systematic bias observed. Both systems showed statistically insignificant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05) between measurements, and correlation values ranged from 0.83 to 0.99, indicating strong associations. These findings highlight the high validity and reliability of both TecnoBody D-Wall and Kinovea systems in measuring joint angles during dynamic movements. The comparable accuracy between systems suggests that either system can be effectively utilized in clinical or research settings, depending on specific needs and resource availability.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/80movement biomechanicsTecnoBodytest-retest reliabilityfunctional movement analysis |
| spellingShingle | Caglar Soylu Gorkem Acar Berkay Uzumcu Pervin Demir Sinan Seyhan Turker Biyikli Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals Life movement biomechanics TecnoBody test-retest reliability functional movement analysis |
| title | Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals |
| title_full | Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals |
| title_fullStr | Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals |
| title_full_unstemmed | Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals |
| title_short | Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals |
| title_sort | test retest reliability and validity of tecnobody d wall to assess the range of motion during overhead squat in healthy individuals |
| topic | movement biomechanics TecnoBody test-retest reliability functional movement analysis |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/80 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caglarsoylu testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals AT gorkemacar testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals AT berkayuzumcu testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals AT pervindemir testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals AT sinanseyhan testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals AT turkerbiyikli testretestreliabilityandvalidityoftecnobodydwalltoassesstherangeofmotionduringoverheadsquatinhealthyindividuals |