Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression

Abstract Background The aggressiveness of college students has attracted widespread attention due to its significant negative impact. Studies had found that subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) can influence individual aggression. However, few studies have explored the essential mechanisms and infl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuanbai Zhu, Jianing Gan, Xiaoli Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03138-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849331880625700864
author Xuanbai Zhu
Jianing Gan
Xiaoli Yang
author_facet Xuanbai Zhu
Jianing Gan
Xiaoli Yang
author_sort Xuanbai Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The aggressiveness of college students has attracted widespread attention due to its significant negative impact. Studies had found that subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) can influence individual aggression. However, few studies have explored the essential mechanisms and influencing factors behind. Thus, this study explores the relationship between SSS and aggression, also the roles of attributions for wealth and poverty and social mobility beliefs within this context. Methods Study 1 manipulated the SSS of 270 participants (130 in the high SSS group, 140 in the low SSS group) experimentally to explore the mediating role of attributions for wealth and poverty on the impact of SSS on aggression. Study 2 manipulated the social mobility beliefs of another 270 participants (139 in high social mobility beliefs group, 131 in the low social mobility beliefs group) to examine the moderating effects of these beliefs. This study conducted descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, mediation model test, and moderated mediation analysis on the obtained data using SPSS 20.0 and PROCESS v4.0. Results (1) SSS significantly negatively predicted aggression (β = -0.37, t(268) = -2.75, p < 0.01). Attributions for wealth and poverty plays a mediating role in it, with a mediating effect value of -0.10, and the mediating effect accounts for 27.03% of the total effect. (2) Social mobility beliefs in SSS and attributions for wealth and poverty (β = 0.30, t(268) = 2.72, p < 0.01) and between SSS and aggressive (β = -0.25, t(268) = -2.11, p < 0.05) were the significant adjustment. Conclusion SSS can directly affect college students’ aggression and can also indirectly affect aggression through the mediating effect of attributions for wealth and poverty. The improvement of social mobility beliefs promotes college students’ attributions for wealth and poverty internally, thereby reducing their aggressiveness. These findings not only enrich the research on SSS and aggression, providing new insights for understanding the relationship between socioeconomic status differences and aggression, but also suggest that policymakers, school psychological service providers and school teachers need to pay attention to the social mobility beliefs of college students, create a fairer social environment and encourage them to view personal development with a more positive perspective.
format Article
id doaj-art-40c295e785da424fb0d17955f452befc
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-40c295e785da424fb0d17955f452befc2025-08-20T03:46:23ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-07-0113111310.1186/s40359-025-03138-5Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggressionXuanbai Zhu0Jianing Gan1Xiaoli Yang2School of Psychology, Northwest Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Northwest Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Northwest Normal UniversityAbstract Background The aggressiveness of college students has attracted widespread attention due to its significant negative impact. Studies had found that subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) can influence individual aggression. However, few studies have explored the essential mechanisms and influencing factors behind. Thus, this study explores the relationship between SSS and aggression, also the roles of attributions for wealth and poverty and social mobility beliefs within this context. Methods Study 1 manipulated the SSS of 270 participants (130 in the high SSS group, 140 in the low SSS group) experimentally to explore the mediating role of attributions for wealth and poverty on the impact of SSS on aggression. Study 2 manipulated the social mobility beliefs of another 270 participants (139 in high social mobility beliefs group, 131 in the low social mobility beliefs group) to examine the moderating effects of these beliefs. This study conducted descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, mediation model test, and moderated mediation analysis on the obtained data using SPSS 20.0 and PROCESS v4.0. Results (1) SSS significantly negatively predicted aggression (β = -0.37, t(268) = -2.75, p < 0.01). Attributions for wealth and poverty plays a mediating role in it, with a mediating effect value of -0.10, and the mediating effect accounts for 27.03% of the total effect. (2) Social mobility beliefs in SSS and attributions for wealth and poverty (β = 0.30, t(268) = 2.72, p < 0.01) and between SSS and aggressive (β = -0.25, t(268) = -2.11, p < 0.05) were the significant adjustment. Conclusion SSS can directly affect college students’ aggression and can also indirectly affect aggression through the mediating effect of attributions for wealth and poverty. The improvement of social mobility beliefs promotes college students’ attributions for wealth and poverty internally, thereby reducing their aggressiveness. These findings not only enrich the research on SSS and aggression, providing new insights for understanding the relationship between socioeconomic status differences and aggression, but also suggest that policymakers, school psychological service providers and school teachers need to pay attention to the social mobility beliefs of college students, create a fairer social environment and encourage them to view personal development with a more positive perspective.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03138-5Subjective socioeconomic statusAggressionAttributions for wealth and povertySocial mobility beliefs
spellingShingle Xuanbai Zhu
Jianing Gan
Xiaoli Yang
Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
BMC Psychology
Subjective socioeconomic status
Aggression
Attributions for wealth and poverty
Social mobility beliefs
title Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
title_full Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
title_fullStr Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
title_full_unstemmed Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
title_short Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
title_sort social mobility beliefs moderate links between sss attributions for wealth and poverty and aggression
topic Subjective socioeconomic status
Aggression
Attributions for wealth and poverty
Social mobility beliefs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03138-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xuanbaizhu socialmobilitybeliefsmoderatelinksbetweensssattributionsforwealthandpovertyandaggression
AT jianinggan socialmobilitybeliefsmoderatelinksbetweensssattributionsforwealthandpovertyandaggression
AT xiaoliyang socialmobilitybeliefsmoderatelinksbetweensssattributionsforwealthandpovertyandaggression