False claims of equivalence in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review protocol
Introduction Research quality within the neurosurgical field remains suboptimal. Therefore, many studies published in the neurosurgical literature lack enough statistical power to establish the presence or absence of clinically important differences between treatment arms. The field of neurotrauma d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Angelos G Kolias, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Wellingson S Paiva, João Vitor Miranda Porto Oliveira, André Luiz Freitas Oliveira Júnior |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/7/e044794.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Long-Term Functional Recovery after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with Type II Diffuse Injury
by: Marcia Harumy Yoshikawa, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Neurosurgeons’ experiences of conducting and disseminating clinical research in low-income and middle-income countries: a reflexive thematic analysis
by: Angelos G Kolias, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Proximity, Family Lore, and False Claims to an Algonquin Identity
by: Darryl Leroux
Published: (2024-10-01) -
The application of medical ethics in the developing countries – A neurosurgical perspective
by: Iftakher Hossain, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Vocal Learning Versus Speech Evolution: Untangling a False Equivalence
by: Adriano R. Lameira
Published: (2025-04-01)