The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas

Robust monitoring techniques, capable of showing change in the savanna when change has occurred, are a prerequisite for better managing this ecosystem. The Step Point Method is a well-established technique in South African range surveys (Short and Morris 2016). However, it is often considered inaccu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armand A. Biko’o, Willem J. Myburgh, Brian K. Reilly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/3/146
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850089434121240576
author Armand A. Biko’o
Willem J. Myburgh
Brian K. Reilly
author_facet Armand A. Biko’o
Willem J. Myburgh
Brian K. Reilly
author_sort Armand A. Biko’o
collection DOAJ
description Robust monitoring techniques, capable of showing change in the savanna when change has occurred, are a prerequisite for better managing this ecosystem. The Step Point Method is a well-established technique in South African range surveys (Short and Morris 2016). However, it is often considered inaccurate in describing vegetation dynamics in the savanna herbaceous layer due primarily to issues with sample sizes and cover estimates, its inability to capture the spatial heterogeneity and patchy distribution typical of these ecosystems, sensitivity to observer bias, reliance on relative values and poor inclusion of sparse or less common species. This study aimed to test the effectiveness and accuracy of the Step Point Method for monitoring the herbaceous layer of savanna by comparison to absolute densities of plants. The results show that the Step Point Method only recorded 41–50% of species richness. It overestimated the relative species richness of grasses by 17.4% while underestimating that of forbs by 13.8% on average. The relative abundance of grasses was overestimated by 32.4%, while that of forbs was underestimated on average by 28.4%. Dominance was overestimated by 115.5% on average, and species diversity was underestimated by 15%. Considering these shortcomings, the Step Point Method should be used with extreme caution in studies focusing on monitoring temporal and spatial changes in veld condition and for biodiversity management.
format Article
id doaj-art-402327f3689c4fb0ad251d4fab544eff
institution DOAJ
issn 1424-2818
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diversity
spelling doaj-art-402327f3689c4fb0ad251d4fab544eff2025-08-20T02:42:46ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182025-02-0117314610.3390/d17030146The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African SavannasArmand A. Biko’o0Willem J. Myburgh1Brian K. Reilly2Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South AfricaDepartment of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South AfricaDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South AfricaRobust monitoring techniques, capable of showing change in the savanna when change has occurred, are a prerequisite for better managing this ecosystem. The Step Point Method is a well-established technique in South African range surveys (Short and Morris 2016). However, it is often considered inaccurate in describing vegetation dynamics in the savanna herbaceous layer due primarily to issues with sample sizes and cover estimates, its inability to capture the spatial heterogeneity and patchy distribution typical of these ecosystems, sensitivity to observer bias, reliance on relative values and poor inclusion of sparse or less common species. This study aimed to test the effectiveness and accuracy of the Step Point Method for monitoring the herbaceous layer of savanna by comparison to absolute densities of plants. The results show that the Step Point Method only recorded 41–50% of species richness. It overestimated the relative species richness of grasses by 17.4% while underestimating that of forbs by 13.8% on average. The relative abundance of grasses was overestimated by 32.4%, while that of forbs was underestimated on average by 28.4%. Dominance was overestimated by 115.5% on average, and species diversity was underestimated by 15%. Considering these shortcomings, the Step Point Method should be used with extreme caution in studies focusing on monitoring temporal and spatial changes in veld condition and for biodiversity management.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/3/146step point methoddominancerelative abundancespecies richnessspecies diversity
spellingShingle Armand A. Biko’o
Willem J. Myburgh
Brian K. Reilly
The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
Diversity
step point method
dominance
relative abundance
species richness
species diversity
title The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
title_full The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
title_fullStr The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
title_short The Accuracy of the Step Point Vegetation Sampling Method for Herbaceous Layer Monitoring in South African Savannas
title_sort accuracy of the step point vegetation sampling method for herbaceous layer monitoring in south african savannas
topic step point method
dominance
relative abundance
species richness
species diversity
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/3/146
work_keys_str_mv AT armandabikoo theaccuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas
AT willemjmyburgh theaccuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas
AT briankreilly theaccuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas
AT armandabikoo accuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas
AT willemjmyburgh accuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas
AT briankreilly accuracyofthesteppointvegetationsamplingmethodforherbaceouslayermonitoringinsouthafricansavannas