Interpretation battles on Google and YouTube: Islamic and non-Islamic views on rulings about apostasy and theft
Among the believers of Islam, no central, universally accepted institution exists that could decide authoritatively on the interpretations of Islamic norms. Today, internet users encounter an enormous diversity of Muslim and non-Muslim authority claims to interpret the norms of Islam. But which type...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Lino Klevesath |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Political Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1497282/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah
by: Sholihul Huda, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Development of Progressive Islamic Law in Indonesia Regarding ‘Apostasy’ as Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Maqasid Sharia
by: Miftakhul Huda, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
Mélancolie et apostasie aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
by: Mathilde Bernard
Published: (2015-12-01) -
An Analysis of the Role of "Concealment" in the Determination of the Punishment for Theft from the Perspectives of Islamic Jurisprudence and Iranian Law
by: Yazdan Taherabadi
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Sheikh al-Qaraḍāwī’s Independent Reasoning (Ijtihād) in Reformulating Contemporary Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence within the Framework of the Modern State
by: Gaber Mohamed
Published: (2025-01-01)