Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands

Dynamic time history analysis has long been regarded as an acceptable and reliable method for the seismic design of structures. The methodology for conducting such analyses, particularly for modern structures with advanced seismic resisting systems, is generally not covered by codal guidelines and i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soheil Assadi, Ashkan Hashemi, Nicholas Chan, Pierre Quenneville
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/802
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850051775495667712
author Soheil Assadi
Ashkan Hashemi
Nicholas Chan
Pierre Quenneville
author_facet Soheil Assadi
Ashkan Hashemi
Nicholas Chan
Pierre Quenneville
author_sort Soheil Assadi
collection DOAJ
description Dynamic time history analysis has long been regarded as an acceptable and reliable method for the seismic design of structures. The methodology for conducting such analyses, particularly for modern structures with advanced seismic resisting systems, is generally not covered by codal guidelines and is often categorized as “alternative” analysis. Resilient rocking wall systems with low-damage hold-downs fall within the “alternative” design category for most international standards, and designs must include dynamic time history analysis. However, the analysis results are influenced by factors such as ground motion selection, scaling methodologies, modeling considerations employed, and the assumptions embedded within the numerical model. This study takes a practical approach and assesses their impact on the structural response and seismic demand determination of a selected mass timber archetype featuring a rocking wall system with friction connections. The investigation into modeling considerations explores various damping models, time history analysis methods, and the associated variables within these models. It is demonstrated that varied seismic demands can result from different selections and modeling assumptions. However, with careful and rational engineering judgment and selection during the analysis process, reasonably close and acceptable seismic demands can be achieved. Furthermore, the authors provide recommendations and insights to enhance the analysis and design demand determination process.
format Article
id doaj-art-3fd6f93cf738485ca84e2c00a29af5c9
institution DOAJ
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-3fd6f93cf738485ca84e2c00a29af5c92025-08-20T02:53:02ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-03-0115580210.3390/buildings15050802Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance DemandsSoheil Assadi0Ashkan Hashemi1Nicholas Chan2Pierre Quenneville3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDynamic time history analysis has long been regarded as an acceptable and reliable method for the seismic design of structures. The methodology for conducting such analyses, particularly for modern structures with advanced seismic resisting systems, is generally not covered by codal guidelines and is often categorized as “alternative” analysis. Resilient rocking wall systems with low-damage hold-downs fall within the “alternative” design category for most international standards, and designs must include dynamic time history analysis. However, the analysis results are influenced by factors such as ground motion selection, scaling methodologies, modeling considerations employed, and the assumptions embedded within the numerical model. This study takes a practical approach and assesses their impact on the structural response and seismic demand determination of a selected mass timber archetype featuring a rocking wall system with friction connections. The investigation into modeling considerations explores various damping models, time history analysis methods, and the associated variables within these models. It is demonstrated that varied seismic demands can result from different selections and modeling assumptions. However, with careful and rational engineering judgment and selection during the analysis process, reasonably close and acceptable seismic demands can be achieved. Furthermore, the authors provide recommendations and insights to enhance the analysis and design demand determination process.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/802resiliencerocking wallfriction connectiondampingcross laminated timberself-centering
spellingShingle Soheil Assadi
Ashkan Hashemi
Nicholas Chan
Pierre Quenneville
Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
Buildings
resilience
rocking wall
friction connection
damping
cross laminated timber
self-centering
title Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
title_full Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
title_fullStr Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
title_short Dynamic Analysis of Resilient Rocking Wall Structures: A Numerical Study on Performance Demands
title_sort dynamic analysis of resilient rocking wall structures a numerical study on performance demands
topic resilience
rocking wall
friction connection
damping
cross laminated timber
self-centering
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/802
work_keys_str_mv AT soheilassadi dynamicanalysisofresilientrockingwallstructuresanumericalstudyonperformancedemands
AT ashkanhashemi dynamicanalysisofresilientrockingwallstructuresanumericalstudyonperformancedemands
AT nicholaschan dynamicanalysisofresilientrockingwallstructuresanumericalstudyonperformancedemands
AT pierrequenneville dynamicanalysisofresilientrockingwallstructuresanumericalstudyonperformancedemands