Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Abstract Background Collaborative multidisciplinary approaches in obstetrics, particularly in conjunction with Intensive Care Units (ICUs), offer innovative treatment strategies for critically ill pregnant women. This study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes and mortality in critically ill pregnant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weiman Liu, Junyou Su, Sumei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07162-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594330764705792
author Weiman Liu
Junyou Su
Sumei Wang
author_facet Weiman Liu
Junyou Su
Sumei Wang
author_sort Weiman Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Collaborative multidisciplinary approaches in obstetrics, particularly in conjunction with Intensive Care Units (ICUs), offer innovative treatment strategies for critically ill pregnant women. This study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes and mortality in critically ill pregnant women in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and to provide valuable clinical insights for improving the management of obstetric emergency care, reducing maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, and improving the level of obstetric care. Methods This study retrospectively included 152 critically ill pregnant women admitted to the ICU. They were grouped according to the main reason for ICU admission as well as the variety of diseases present at the time of admission. Then their clinical data were evaluated. Results The results showed that the main obstetric factors leading to ICU admission were pregnancy-related hypertensive disease, postpartum hemorrhage, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy; the non-obstetric factors included either pregnancy complicated by heart disease, sepsis, or malignant tumors. The maternal mortality rate was higher in the non-obstetric direct factor group than in the obstetric direct factor group (22.12% vs. 6.25%, p = 0.016). As for the pregnancy outcome, the cesarean section rate in the group affected by obstetric factors was significantly higher than that in the group affected by non-obstetric factors (p = 0.008). Furthermore, the incidence of pregnancy termination and induced abortion before 28 weeks in the group affected by non-obstetric factors was significantly higher than that in the group affected by obstetric factors (all p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in mortality among the three groups of patients with different SOFA scores (p = 0.000), suggesting that the mortality of critically ill pregnant women with higher SOFA scores increased, making it a valuable tool for evaluating prognosis. Conclusion Non-obstetric factors were the primary contributors for ICU admission of expecting mothers. Therefore, utilizing modalities that successfully analyze these factors can aid in understanding the characteristics of critically ill pregnant women, and advancing perinatal healthcare technologies to reduce maternal mortality rates.
format Article
id doaj-art-3fbb85d69f394b23b2ab02df8e7e62ff
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2393
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj-art-3fbb85d69f394b23b2ab02df8e7e62ff2025-01-19T12:42:38ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932025-01-012511910.1186/s12884-025-07162-6Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care UnitWeiman Liu0Junyou Su1Sumei Wang2Department of Obstetrics, Fangchenggang First Peopl’s HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityAbstract Background Collaborative multidisciplinary approaches in obstetrics, particularly in conjunction with Intensive Care Units (ICUs), offer innovative treatment strategies for critically ill pregnant women. This study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes and mortality in critically ill pregnant women in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and to provide valuable clinical insights for improving the management of obstetric emergency care, reducing maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, and improving the level of obstetric care. Methods This study retrospectively included 152 critically ill pregnant women admitted to the ICU. They were grouped according to the main reason for ICU admission as well as the variety of diseases present at the time of admission. Then their clinical data were evaluated. Results The results showed that the main obstetric factors leading to ICU admission were pregnancy-related hypertensive disease, postpartum hemorrhage, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy; the non-obstetric factors included either pregnancy complicated by heart disease, sepsis, or malignant tumors. The maternal mortality rate was higher in the non-obstetric direct factor group than in the obstetric direct factor group (22.12% vs. 6.25%, p = 0.016). As for the pregnancy outcome, the cesarean section rate in the group affected by obstetric factors was significantly higher than that in the group affected by non-obstetric factors (p = 0.008). Furthermore, the incidence of pregnancy termination and induced abortion before 28 weeks in the group affected by non-obstetric factors was significantly higher than that in the group affected by obstetric factors (all p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in mortality among the three groups of patients with different SOFA scores (p = 0.000), suggesting that the mortality of critically ill pregnant women with higher SOFA scores increased, making it a valuable tool for evaluating prognosis. Conclusion Non-obstetric factors were the primary contributors for ICU admission of expecting mothers. Therefore, utilizing modalities that successfully analyze these factors can aid in understanding the characteristics of critically ill pregnant women, and advancing perinatal healthcare technologies to reduce maternal mortality rates.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07162-6EtiologyPregnancy outcomesIntensive Care UnitCritically ill pregnant women
spellingShingle Weiman Liu
Junyou Su
Sumei Wang
Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Etiology
Pregnancy outcomes
Intensive Care Unit
Critically ill pregnant women
title Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
title_full Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
title_short Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit
title_sort examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the intensive care unit
topic Etiology
Pregnancy outcomes
Intensive Care Unit
Critically ill pregnant women
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07162-6
work_keys_str_mv AT weimanliu examiningtheetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesof152criticallyillpregnantpatientsintheintensivecareunit
AT junyousu examiningtheetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesof152criticallyillpregnantpatientsintheintensivecareunit
AT sumeiwang examiningtheetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesof152criticallyillpregnantpatientsintheintensivecareunit