Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient waits for gynaecology appointments increased by 60% in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to use the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Menstrual, Pain and Hormonal (ePAQ-MPH) electronic patient repor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Gray, Sandra Johnson, Edward Prosser-Snelling, Paul Simpson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112183127113728
author Thomas Gray
Sandra Johnson
Edward Prosser-Snelling
Paul Simpson
author_facet Thomas Gray
Sandra Johnson
Edward Prosser-Snelling
Paul Simpson
author_sort Thomas Gray
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient waits for gynaecology appointments increased by 60% in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to use the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Menstrual, Pain and Hormonal (ePAQ-MPH) electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) to assess symptoms, impact and potential harm for patients waiting > 60 weeks for general gynaecology appointments at a teaching hospital. Methods 1070 patients waiting > 60 weeks for a new appointment (range 60–72 weeks) were invited to complete ePAQ-MPH online to measure gynaecological symptoms and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Patients could also call to cancel appointments no longer needed. Non-responders were telephoned weekly for three further weeks and asked to complete ePAQ-MPH. Patients scoring > 80/100 for ePAQ-MPH domains relating to HRQoL had their appointment escalated to be seen within six-eight weeks. Thematic content analysis was undertaken of free-text concerns recorded using ePAQ-MPH. Results 526 patients completed ePAQ-MPH (49.2%), 169 of these scored greater than 80/100 for one or more HRQoL domains and were seen within 6–8 weeks. 103 patients (9.6%) requested to cancel their appointment. Reasons included problem resolving spontaneously (33%), problem treated by general practitioner (10%) and being seen by a private provider (28%). Commonly recorded free-text concerns related to wanting a diagnosis (n = 142), management of condition (n = 98) and pain management (n = 77). Conclusions ePAQ-MPH may be used effectively to prioritise patients waiting for an outpatient appointment in gynaecology. Wider use of ePROMs to support waiting list validation within the NHS and elsewhere should be considered.
format Article
id doaj-art-3fa2ecfe35394f308eacea9ccb35f6fd
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6874
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Women's Health
spelling doaj-art-3fa2ecfe35394f308eacea9ccb35f6fd2024-12-22T12:45:02ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742024-12-012411810.1186/s12905-024-03506-0Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecologyThomas Gray0Sandra Johnson1Edward Prosser-Snelling2Paul Simpson3Department of Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNorwich Medical School, University of East AngliaDepartment of Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient waits for gynaecology appointments increased by 60% in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to use the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Menstrual, Pain and Hormonal (ePAQ-MPH) electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) to assess symptoms, impact and potential harm for patients waiting > 60 weeks for general gynaecology appointments at a teaching hospital. Methods 1070 patients waiting > 60 weeks for a new appointment (range 60–72 weeks) were invited to complete ePAQ-MPH online to measure gynaecological symptoms and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Patients could also call to cancel appointments no longer needed. Non-responders were telephoned weekly for three further weeks and asked to complete ePAQ-MPH. Patients scoring > 80/100 for ePAQ-MPH domains relating to HRQoL had their appointment escalated to be seen within six-eight weeks. Thematic content analysis was undertaken of free-text concerns recorded using ePAQ-MPH. Results 526 patients completed ePAQ-MPH (49.2%), 169 of these scored greater than 80/100 for one or more HRQoL domains and were seen within 6–8 weeks. 103 patients (9.6%) requested to cancel their appointment. Reasons included problem resolving spontaneously (33%), problem treated by general practitioner (10%) and being seen by a private provider (28%). Commonly recorded free-text concerns related to wanting a diagnosis (n = 142), management of condition (n = 98) and pain management (n = 77). Conclusions ePAQ-MPH may be used effectively to prioritise patients waiting for an outpatient appointment in gynaecology. Wider use of ePROMs to support waiting list validation within the NHS and elsewhere should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0Patient reported outcome measuresPROMsWaiting listHarmCovid-19Utility
spellingShingle Thomas Gray
Sandra Johnson
Edward Prosser-Snelling
Paul Simpson
Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
BMC Women's Health
Patient reported outcome measures
PROMs
Waiting list
Harm
Covid-19
Utility
title Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
title_full Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
title_fullStr Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
title_full_unstemmed Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
title_short Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology
title_sort using an electronic patient reported outcome measure epaq mph to assess potential harm for long waiting patients in gynaecology
topic Patient reported outcome measures
PROMs
Waiting list
Harm
Covid-19
Utility
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasgray usinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasureepaqmphtoassesspotentialharmforlongwaitingpatientsingynaecology
AT sandrajohnson usinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasureepaqmphtoassesspotentialharmforlongwaitingpatientsingynaecology
AT edwardprossersnelling usinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasureepaqmphtoassesspotentialharmforlongwaitingpatientsingynaecology
AT paulsimpson usinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasureepaqmphtoassesspotentialharmforlongwaitingpatientsingynaecology