The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia

Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) has become the preferred method in several intensive care units (ICUs), but data on PDT performed in immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patients are scarce. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of PDT in immunosuppressed and thromboc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marianne Angelberger, Michaela Barnikel, Alessia Fraccaroli, Johanna Tischer, Sofía Antón, Alexandra Pawlikowski, Mark op den Winkel, Hans Joachim Stemmler, Stephanie-Susanne Stecher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Critical Care Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5356413
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553673975136256
author Marianne Angelberger
Michaela Barnikel
Alessia Fraccaroli
Johanna Tischer
Sofía Antón
Alexandra Pawlikowski
Mark op den Winkel
Hans Joachim Stemmler
Stephanie-Susanne Stecher
author_facet Marianne Angelberger
Michaela Barnikel
Alessia Fraccaroli
Johanna Tischer
Sofía Antón
Alexandra Pawlikowski
Mark op den Winkel
Hans Joachim Stemmler
Stephanie-Susanne Stecher
author_sort Marianne Angelberger
collection DOAJ
description Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) has become the preferred method in several intensive care units (ICUs), but data on PDT performed in immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patients are scarce. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of PDT in immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patients compared to conventional open surgical tracheostomy (OST). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients who underwent PDT or OST between May 2017 and November 2020. Our outcomes were stoma site infections and bleeding complications. Results. 63 patients underwent PDT, and 21 patients underwent OST. Distribution of gender ratio, age, SAPS II, time of ventilation before tracheostomy, and preexisting hematooncological diseases was comparable between the two groups. After allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), patients were more likely to undergo PDT than OST (p=0.033). The PDT cohort suffered from mucositis more frequently (p=0.043). There were no significant differences in leucocyte or platelet count on the tracheostomy day. Patients with coagulation disorders and patients under immunosuppression were distributed equally among both groups. Stoma site infection was documented in five cases in PDT and eight cases in the OST group. Moderate infections were remarkably increased in the OST group. Smears were positive in six cases in the PDT group; none of these patients had local infection signs. In the OST group, smears were positive in four cases; all had signs of a stroma site infection. Postprocedural bleedings occurred in eight cases (9.5%) and were observed significantly more often in the OST group (p=0.001), leading to emergency surgery in one case of the OST group. Conclusion. PDT is a feasible and safe procedure in a predominantly immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patient cohort without an increased risk for stoma site infections or bleeding complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-3f5effd637b6442f80778910dc5802c5
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1313
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Critical Care Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-3f5effd637b6442f80778910dc5802c52025-02-03T05:53:27ZengWileyCritical Care Research and Practice2090-13132022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5356413The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without ThrombocytopeniaMarianne Angelberger0Michaela Barnikel1Alessia Fraccaroli2Johanna Tischer3Sofía Antón4Alexandra Pawlikowski5Mark op den Winkel6Hans Joachim Stemmler7Stephanie-Susanne Stecher8Department of Medicine IIDepartment of Medicine VDepartment of Medicine IIIDepartment of Medicine IIIDepartment of Medicine IIDepartment of Medicine IIIDepartment of Medicine IIDepartment of Medicine IIIDepartment of Medicine IIBackground. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) has become the preferred method in several intensive care units (ICUs), but data on PDT performed in immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patients are scarce. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of PDT in immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patients compared to conventional open surgical tracheostomy (OST). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients who underwent PDT or OST between May 2017 and November 2020. Our outcomes were stoma site infections and bleeding complications. Results. 63 patients underwent PDT, and 21 patients underwent OST. Distribution of gender ratio, age, SAPS II, time of ventilation before tracheostomy, and preexisting hematooncological diseases was comparable between the two groups. After allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), patients were more likely to undergo PDT than OST (p=0.033). The PDT cohort suffered from mucositis more frequently (p=0.043). There were no significant differences in leucocyte or platelet count on the tracheostomy day. Patients with coagulation disorders and patients under immunosuppression were distributed equally among both groups. Stoma site infection was documented in five cases in PDT and eight cases in the OST group. Moderate infections were remarkably increased in the OST group. Smears were positive in six cases in the PDT group; none of these patients had local infection signs. In the OST group, smears were positive in four cases; all had signs of a stroma site infection. Postprocedural bleedings occurred in eight cases (9.5%) and were observed significantly more often in the OST group (p=0.001), leading to emergency surgery in one case of the OST group. Conclusion. PDT is a feasible and safe procedure in a predominantly immunosuppressed and thrombocytopenic patient cohort without an increased risk for stoma site infections or bleeding complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5356413
spellingShingle Marianne Angelberger
Michaela Barnikel
Alessia Fraccaroli
Johanna Tischer
Sofía Antón
Alexandra Pawlikowski
Mark op den Winkel
Hans Joachim Stemmler
Stephanie-Susanne Stecher
The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
Critical Care Research and Practice
title The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
title_full The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
title_fullStr The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
title_full_unstemmed The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
title_short The Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Immunosuppressed ICU Patients with or without Thrombocytopenia
title_sort feasibility of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in immunosuppressed icu patients with or without thrombocytopenia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5356413
work_keys_str_mv AT marianneangelberger thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT michaelabarnikel thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT alessiafraccaroli thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT johannatischer thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT sofiaanton thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT alexandrapawlikowski thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT markopdenwinkel thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT hansjoachimstemmler thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT stephaniesusannestecher thefeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT marianneangelberger feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT michaelabarnikel feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT alessiafraccaroli feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT johannatischer feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT sofiaanton feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT alexandrapawlikowski feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT markopdenwinkel feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT hansjoachimstemmler feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia
AT stephaniesusannestecher feasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyinimmunosuppressedicupatientswithorwithoutthrombocytopenia