Real-world evidence vs. clinical trials: outcome disparities in valve interventions
Clinical trials serve as the gold standard for evaluating the safety and efficacy of valve therapies, including transcatheter and surgical procedures, which have undergone remarkable advancements in recent years. However, discrepancies between findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and re...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Omar Elsaka |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | MGM Journal of Medical Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_70_25 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Treatment of the Aortic Valve in the Modern Era—A Review of TAVR vs. SAVR
by: Albert Dweck, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
SAVR and TAVI comparison across the globe based on current regional registry evidence – A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data
by: Tulio Caldonazo, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Sex‐Associated Disparities in Surgical and Percutaneous Management of Aortic Stenosis With Severe Features: Retrospective Analysis From the National Readmission Database
by: Gianluca Castaldi, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Comparative outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis patients: insights from the SWEDEHEART registry
by: Antros Louca, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Acute Valve Syndrome in Aortic Stenosis
by: Philippe Généreux, MD, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)