The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study

Abstract Background The process of identifying and discontinuing medicines in instances in which harms outweigh benefits (deprescribing) can mitigate the negative consequences of problematic polypharmacy. This process should be conducted with a focus on the patient and involve collaborative decision...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. A. Okeowo, B. Fylan, S. T. R. Zaidi, D. P. Alldred
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-10-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05435-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850181457696260096
author D. A. Okeowo
B. Fylan
S. T. R. Zaidi
D. P. Alldred
author_facet D. A. Okeowo
B. Fylan
S. T. R. Zaidi
D. P. Alldred
author_sort D. A. Okeowo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The process of identifying and discontinuing medicines in instances in which harms outweigh benefits (deprescribing) can mitigate the negative consequences of problematic polypharmacy. This process should be conducted with a focus on the patient and involve collaborative decision-making. Evidence is needed regarding patients’ views on how deprescribing should be safely and routinely implemented in English primary care to improve its application. This study aimed to identify optimal methods of introducing and actioning deprescribing from the patient’s perspective. Methods Participants in England aged 65 and above who were taking five or more medicines and residing in their own homes were recruited through social media and service user groups. An interview guide was created from deprescribing literature and input from patients and the public, guided by the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). The interviews were held online using Microsoft Teams® or via phone, recorded, and then transcribed. The data was analysed using the Framework analysis. Results Twenty patients (mean age of 74.5, SD = 6.93), with 75% being female, were enrolled in the study. Three main themes emerged: (1) ‘Why deprescribe now?’ emphasised the significance of explaining the reasons behind deprescribing; (2) ‘Monitoring and follow-up’ underscored the necessity of safety measures during deprescribing and patients’ willingness to self-monitor post-intervention; (3) ‘Roles and relationships’ explored patient perceptions of various healthcare professionals involved in deprescribing and the essential interpersonal skills for fostering therapeutic relationships. Conclusion Optimal methods of introducing deprescribing included communicating a convincing rationale for stopping medicines and preparing patients for deprescribing conversations. Patients required support from a range of healthcare professionals with whom they had an existing therapeutic relationship. Whilst patients were motivated to self-monitor unwanted/unexpected effects post-deprescribing, timely support was required. The nature of such bolstered collective action and cognitive participation within NPT enhances the normalisation potential of deprescribing. These findings highlight the significance of considering the content and process of deprescribing consultations to enhance normalisation and tackle problematic polypharmacy. This provides a deeper understanding of patients’ needs for implementing safe and routine deprescribing in primary care, which should be considered when designing medication review and deprescribing services.
format Article
id doaj-art-3efec6cadfaf45c1b643bbac2e14fbc8
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2318
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj-art-3efec6cadfaf45c1b643bbac2e14fbc82025-08-20T02:17:53ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182024-10-0124111210.1186/s12877-024-05435-xThe patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative studyD. A. Okeowo0B. Fylan1S. T. R. Zaidi2D. P. Alldred3School of Healthcare, University of LeedsSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of BradfordSchool of Healthcare, University of LeedsSchool of Healthcare, University of LeedsAbstract Background The process of identifying and discontinuing medicines in instances in which harms outweigh benefits (deprescribing) can mitigate the negative consequences of problematic polypharmacy. This process should be conducted with a focus on the patient and involve collaborative decision-making. Evidence is needed regarding patients’ views on how deprescribing should be safely and routinely implemented in English primary care to improve its application. This study aimed to identify optimal methods of introducing and actioning deprescribing from the patient’s perspective. Methods Participants in England aged 65 and above who were taking five or more medicines and residing in their own homes were recruited through social media and service user groups. An interview guide was created from deprescribing literature and input from patients and the public, guided by the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). The interviews were held online using Microsoft Teams® or via phone, recorded, and then transcribed. The data was analysed using the Framework analysis. Results Twenty patients (mean age of 74.5, SD = 6.93), with 75% being female, were enrolled in the study. Three main themes emerged: (1) ‘Why deprescribe now?’ emphasised the significance of explaining the reasons behind deprescribing; (2) ‘Monitoring and follow-up’ underscored the necessity of safety measures during deprescribing and patients’ willingness to self-monitor post-intervention; (3) ‘Roles and relationships’ explored patient perceptions of various healthcare professionals involved in deprescribing and the essential interpersonal skills for fostering therapeutic relationships. Conclusion Optimal methods of introducing deprescribing included communicating a convincing rationale for stopping medicines and preparing patients for deprescribing conversations. Patients required support from a range of healthcare professionals with whom they had an existing therapeutic relationship. Whilst patients were motivated to self-monitor unwanted/unexpected effects post-deprescribing, timely support was required. The nature of such bolstered collective action and cognitive participation within NPT enhances the normalisation potential of deprescribing. These findings highlight the significance of considering the content and process of deprescribing consultations to enhance normalisation and tackle problematic polypharmacy. This provides a deeper understanding of patients’ needs for implementing safe and routine deprescribing in primary care, which should be considered when designing medication review and deprescribing services.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05435-xDeprescribingImplementationNPTPrimary care
spellingShingle D. A. Okeowo
B. Fylan
S. T. R. Zaidi
D. P. Alldred
The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
BMC Geriatrics
Deprescribing
Implementation
NPT
Primary care
title The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
title_full The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
title_fullStr The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
title_short The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study
title_sort patient s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy a qualitative study
topic Deprescribing
Implementation
NPT
Primary care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05435-x
work_keys_str_mv AT daokeowo thepatientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT bfylan thepatientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT strzaidi thepatientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT dpalldred thepatientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT daokeowo patientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT bfylan patientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT strzaidi patientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy
AT dpalldred patientsperspectivesofsafeandroutineproactivedeprescribinginprimarycareforolderpeoplelivingwithpolypharmacyaqualitativestudy