The temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus multilayered inverted flap technique in patients with idiopathic macular hole

Objectives This study aimed to compare the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with the multilayered inverted ILM flap technique for treating idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) by assessing anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional outcome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sameh M. Elgouhary, Safaa M. Abd-elmoaty, Ahmed A. Salama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ejos.ejos_46_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives This study aimed to compare the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with the multilayered inverted ILM flap technique for treating idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) by assessing anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional outcomes through best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Background ILM flaps act as a scaffold that promotes macular hole closure by facilitating cell proliferation and migration. Patients and methods Patients with IMHs were divided into two groups. Group A underwent the temporal inverted ILM flap technique, while group B received the multilayered inverted ILM flap technique. Preoperative assessment of BCVA, OCT and OCTA. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months by OCT and assessment of BCVA, and OCTA at 3 months. Results The study included 20 eyes with IMH: group A (mean age 60.9±4.51 years) and group B (mean age 62.7±3.74 years). Postoperative OCT revealed no significant differences in closure patterns between the groups. Group A had 60% type U, 10% type V, and 20% type W closure patterns, with 10% of cases failing to close. Group B had 70% type U, 20% type V, and 10% type W closure patterns. BCVA improved from 0.06±0.02 to 0.24±0.14 in group A and from 0.05±0.02 to 0.30±0.11 in group B. Conclusion While no significant anatomical differences were observed between the two techniques, the multilayered inverted ILM flap technique demonstrated superior functional outcomes compared with the temporal flap technique.
ISSN:2090-0686