Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury

Severe thermal injury significantly impacts upon hemostasis and is associated with classical changes to the circulating platelet count with a nadir followed by a rebound thrombocytosis at days ~3 and ~15 post-injury, respectively. To date, few studies have assessed platelet function following therma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Asiri, Joshua M. J. Price, Jon Hazeldine, Kirsty C. McGee, Amanda V. Sardeli, Yung-Yi Chen, Jack Sullivan, Naiem S. Moiemen, Paul Harrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Platelets
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09537104.2024.2420952
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849699731720110080
author Ali Asiri
Joshua M. J. Price
Jon Hazeldine
Kirsty C. McGee
Amanda V. Sardeli
Yung-Yi Chen
Jack Sullivan
Naiem S. Moiemen
Paul Harrison
author_facet Ali Asiri
Joshua M. J. Price
Jon Hazeldine
Kirsty C. McGee
Amanda V. Sardeli
Yung-Yi Chen
Jack Sullivan
Naiem S. Moiemen
Paul Harrison
author_sort Ali Asiri
collection DOAJ
description Severe thermal injury significantly impacts upon hemostasis and is associated with classical changes to the circulating platelet count with a nadir followed by a rebound thrombocytosis at days ~3 and ~15 post-injury, respectively. To date, few studies have assessed platelet function following thermal injury as platelet tests often require large quantities of blood, are not representative of normal platelet pathophysiology, and are usually dependent on a normal platelet count. The purpose of this study was to measure platelet thrombus formation in vitro using a whole blood flow chip-based system following thermal injury and to study how platelet counts may impact upon the measurement. Adult (≥16 years) patients (N = 10) with ≥ 20% total burn surface area (TBSA) burn were recruited within 24 h of injury. Healthy controls (N = 25) were also recruited. Whole blood counts were measured using a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-1000). Platelet function was measured using the Total Thrombus-formation Analyzer System (T-TAS) within chips coated with tissue factor and collagen at shear rates of either 600 sec−1 (AR chips) or 1200 sec−1 (HD chips), the latter test being independent of platelet count. We confirmed the classical nadir in platelet counts following severe thermal injury at days 2, 3, 4 (p < 0.0001) and day 5 (p < 0.01) post-injury compared to healthy controls. Physiological platelet thrombus formation was significantly (p < 0.01) abnormal at day 3 post-injury using the AR chips but was related to the platelet count. However, although platelet dysfunction was not significant using HD chips, some of the results were independent of platelet count. A small number of samples, however, still gave abnormal results suggesting that there can be an underlying acquired platelet functional abnormality. Furthermore, the AR chip Area Under the Curve (AUC) was significantly lower on day 1 post-injury and negatively associated with severity of injury (TBSA, p < 0.05) and higher platelet function (AUC) positively associated with survival (p < 0.05). This study suggests that measuring platelet dysfunction within a more physiological in vitro test may have potential clinical utility. Larger studies are required to fully understand the impact of platelet dysfunction following severe thermal injury.
format Article
id doaj-art-3ec41e0f56c549d9acbdf18103aaeb35
institution DOAJ
issn 0953-7104
1369-1635
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Platelets
spelling doaj-art-3ec41e0f56c549d9acbdf18103aaeb352025-08-20T03:18:31ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlatelets0953-71041369-16352024-12-0135110.1080/09537104.2024.2420952Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injuryAli Asiri0Joshua M. J. Price1Jon Hazeldine2Kirsty C. McGee3Amanda V. Sardeli4Yung-Yi Chen5Jack Sullivan6Naiem S. Moiemen7Paul Harrison8Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKSevere thermal injury significantly impacts upon hemostasis and is associated with classical changes to the circulating platelet count with a nadir followed by a rebound thrombocytosis at days ~3 and ~15 post-injury, respectively. To date, few studies have assessed platelet function following thermal injury as platelet tests often require large quantities of blood, are not representative of normal platelet pathophysiology, and are usually dependent on a normal platelet count. The purpose of this study was to measure platelet thrombus formation in vitro using a whole blood flow chip-based system following thermal injury and to study how platelet counts may impact upon the measurement. Adult (≥16 years) patients (N = 10) with ≥ 20% total burn surface area (TBSA) burn were recruited within 24 h of injury. Healthy controls (N = 25) were also recruited. Whole blood counts were measured using a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-1000). Platelet function was measured using the Total Thrombus-formation Analyzer System (T-TAS) within chips coated with tissue factor and collagen at shear rates of either 600 sec−1 (AR chips) or 1200 sec−1 (HD chips), the latter test being independent of platelet count. We confirmed the classical nadir in platelet counts following severe thermal injury at days 2, 3, 4 (p < 0.0001) and day 5 (p < 0.01) post-injury compared to healthy controls. Physiological platelet thrombus formation was significantly (p < 0.01) abnormal at day 3 post-injury using the AR chips but was related to the platelet count. However, although platelet dysfunction was not significant using HD chips, some of the results were independent of platelet count. A small number of samples, however, still gave abnormal results suggesting that there can be an underlying acquired platelet functional abnormality. Furthermore, the AR chip Area Under the Curve (AUC) was significantly lower on day 1 post-injury and negatively associated with severity of injury (TBSA, p < 0.05) and higher platelet function (AUC) positively associated with survival (p < 0.05). This study suggests that measuring platelet dysfunction within a more physiological in vitro test may have potential clinical utility. Larger studies are required to fully understand the impact of platelet dysfunction following severe thermal injury.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09537104.2024.2420952Platelet countplatelet functionT-TASthermal injury
spellingShingle Ali Asiri
Joshua M. J. Price
Jon Hazeldine
Kirsty C. McGee
Amanda V. Sardeli
Yung-Yi Chen
Jack Sullivan
Naiem S. Moiemen
Paul Harrison
Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
Platelets
Platelet count
platelet function
T-TAS
thermal injury
title Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
title_full Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
title_fullStr Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
title_short Measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
title_sort measurement of platelet thrombus formation in patients following severe thermal injury
topic Platelet count
platelet function
T-TAS
thermal injury
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09537104.2024.2420952
work_keys_str_mv AT aliasiri measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT joshuamjprice measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT jonhazeldine measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT kirstycmcgee measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT amandavsardeli measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT yungyichen measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT jacksullivan measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT naiemsmoiemen measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury
AT paulharrison measurementofplateletthrombusformationinpatientsfollowingseverethermalinjury