Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the number of trials on the recording in the saccadometry test. Method Forty‐five healthy participants (mean age ± SD = 25.89 ± 5.2 years) (31 female and 14 male) aged 19–40 years were included in the study. Each participant und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan, Asya Fatma Men, Zahra Polat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70700
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850066524431187968
author Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan
Asya Fatma Men
Zahra Polat
author_facet Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan
Asya Fatma Men
Zahra Polat
author_sort Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the number of trials on the recording in the saccadometry test. Method Forty‐five healthy participants (mean age ± SD = 25.89 ± 5.2 years) (31 female and 14 male) aged 19–40 years were included in the study. Each participant underwent two saccadometry tests, first a test protocol with 100 trials and then a test protocol with 60 trials, administered by the same experienced clinician, one hour apart. All test settings remained constant between the two test sessions, with the exception of the number of trials. Results With 100 trials, antisaccades had a much higher mean latency (paired samples t‐test; t = 4.838; p = 0.0001 < 0.01), directional error rate (Wilcoxon signed ranks test; Z = −1.991; p = 0.047), and overall error rate (Wilcoxon signed rank test; Z = −2.207; p = 0.027) compared to the results obtained from the test protocol with 60 trials. There was no significant difference in mean velocity or accuracy (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p > 0.05). The prosaccades, mean latency, velocity, directional error, and overall error (Wilcoxon signed ranks test; p > 0.05) and mean accuracy (paired samples t‐test; p > 0.05) did not differ between 100 and 60 trials. Conclusion The decline in antisaccade performance with an increasing number of trials may be attributed to the disruptive effect of mental fatigue on the inhibition process. Further research is required to investigate the relationship between mental fatigue and the inhibition process in the context of antisaccade function.
format Article
id doaj-art-3e65029a67dc4a6fba0eff704736a2b8
institution DOAJ
issn 2162-3279
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj-art-3e65029a67dc4a6fba0eff704736a2b82025-08-20T02:48:43ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792025-07-01157n/an/a10.1002/brb3.70700Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test ResultsAysenur Kucuk Ceyhan0Asya Fatma Men1Zahra Polat2Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Health Sciences Istanbul TurkeyDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Health Sciences Istanbul TurkeyDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Health Sciences Istanbul TurkeyABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the number of trials on the recording in the saccadometry test. Method Forty‐five healthy participants (mean age ± SD = 25.89 ± 5.2 years) (31 female and 14 male) aged 19–40 years were included in the study. Each participant underwent two saccadometry tests, first a test protocol with 100 trials and then a test protocol with 60 trials, administered by the same experienced clinician, one hour apart. All test settings remained constant between the two test sessions, with the exception of the number of trials. Results With 100 trials, antisaccades had a much higher mean latency (paired samples t‐test; t = 4.838; p = 0.0001 < 0.01), directional error rate (Wilcoxon signed ranks test; Z = −1.991; p = 0.047), and overall error rate (Wilcoxon signed rank test; Z = −2.207; p = 0.027) compared to the results obtained from the test protocol with 60 trials. There was no significant difference in mean velocity or accuracy (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p > 0.05). The prosaccades, mean latency, velocity, directional error, and overall error (Wilcoxon signed ranks test; p > 0.05) and mean accuracy (paired samples t‐test; p > 0.05) did not differ between 100 and 60 trials. Conclusion The decline in antisaccade performance with an increasing number of trials may be attributed to the disruptive effect of mental fatigue on the inhibition process. Further research is required to investigate the relationship between mental fatigue and the inhibition process in the context of antisaccade function.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70700antisaccadesnumber of trialsprosaccadessaccadometry test protocolssaccadometry
spellingShingle Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan
Asya Fatma Men
Zahra Polat
Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
Brain and Behavior
antisaccades
number of trials
prosaccades
saccadometry test protocols
saccadometry
title Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
title_full Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
title_fullStr Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
title_short Effects of Different Numbers of Trials on Saccadometry Test Results
title_sort effects of different numbers of trials on saccadometry test results
topic antisaccades
number of trials
prosaccades
saccadometry test protocols
saccadometry
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70700
work_keys_str_mv AT aysenurkucukceyhan effectsofdifferentnumbersoftrialsonsaccadometrytestresults
AT asyafatmamen effectsofdifferentnumbersoftrialsonsaccadometrytestresults
AT zahrapolat effectsofdifferentnumbersoftrialsonsaccadometrytestresults