Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the standard induction therapy for proliferative LN, but it is associated with serious adverse effects such as sterility and bone marrow suppression. Mycophenolate mofetil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rakhesh LR, Priya S Raju, Rajesh Wilson, Bindu Latha Nair R, Sanitha Kuriachan, Mahesh Kumar D, Jumi Jacob
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2025-07-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4589
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850093611459280896
author Rakhesh LR
Priya S Raju
Rajesh Wilson
Bindu Latha Nair R
Sanitha Kuriachan
Mahesh Kumar D
Jumi Jacob
author_facet Rakhesh LR
Priya S Raju
Rajesh Wilson
Bindu Latha Nair R
Sanitha Kuriachan
Mahesh Kumar D
Jumi Jacob
author_sort Rakhesh LR
collection DOAJ
description Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the standard induction therapy for proliferative LN, but it is associated with serious adverse effects such as sterility and bone marrow suppression. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a promising alternative, offering better renal outcomes and preserving fertility in women of childbearing age. Aims and Objectives: To compare the treatment outcomes and safety of MMF plus prednisolone versus CYC plus prednisolone in the induction treatment of LN. Materials and Methods: Patients with Class 3 and 4 LN who received either oral MMF (2 g/day) or CYC (0.75–1 g/m2) were included in the study. Remission rates and adverse events were measured as treatment outcomes. Results: The study found 81% remission in the MMF group compared to 76.4% in the CYC group (not statistically significant). Adverse effects in the MMF group included headache (52.4%), bone marrow toxicity (47.6%), back pain (42.9%), and gastrointestinal side effects (42.8%). The CYC group had higher rates of bone marrow toxicity (57.1%), respiratory infections (33.3%), and mucocutaneous infections (57.1%). Notably, alopecia (4.8% vs. 52.4%, P=0.001) and amenorrhea (4.8% vs. 28.6%, P=0.04) were significantly lower in the MMF group. Conclusion: The MMF-steroid regimen is highly effective for inducing remission in proliferative LN and offers a more favorable safety profile than the CYC-steroid regimen.
format Article
id doaj-art-3e576baf8d474c3192db30022374fa88
institution DOAJ
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-3e576baf8d474c3192db30022374fa882025-08-20T02:41:52ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762025-07-01167105109https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i7.4589Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational studyRakhesh LR 0https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4809-3910Priya S Raju 1https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8964-0341Rajesh Wilson 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-6883Bindu Latha Nair R 3Sanitha Kuriachan 4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2711-9816Mahesh Kumar D 5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-601XJumi Jacob 6https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0763-1975Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Dr. Moopen’s Medical College, Wayanad, Kerala, India Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Moopen’s Medical College, Wayanad, Kerala, India Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Karuna Medical College, Palakkad, Kerala, India Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, IndiaProfessor, Department of Pharmacology, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Sree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Vattappara, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the standard induction therapy for proliferative LN, but it is associated with serious adverse effects such as sterility and bone marrow suppression. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a promising alternative, offering better renal outcomes and preserving fertility in women of childbearing age. Aims and Objectives: To compare the treatment outcomes and safety of MMF plus prednisolone versus CYC plus prednisolone in the induction treatment of LN. Materials and Methods: Patients with Class 3 and 4 LN who received either oral MMF (2 g/day) or CYC (0.75–1 g/m2) were included in the study. Remission rates and adverse events were measured as treatment outcomes. Results: The study found 81% remission in the MMF group compared to 76.4% in the CYC group (not statistically significant). Adverse effects in the MMF group included headache (52.4%), bone marrow toxicity (47.6%), back pain (42.9%), and gastrointestinal side effects (42.8%). The CYC group had higher rates of bone marrow toxicity (57.1%), respiratory infections (33.3%), and mucocutaneous infections (57.1%). Notably, alopecia (4.8% vs. 52.4%, P=0.001) and amenorrhea (4.8% vs. 28.6%, P=0.04) were significantly lower in the MMF group. Conclusion: The MMF-steroid regimen is highly effective for inducing remission in proliferative LN and offers a more favorable safety profile than the CYC-steroid regimen.https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4589lupus nephritis; mycophenolate mofetil; remission induction; cyclophosphamide; side effects
spellingShingle Rakhesh LR
Priya S Raju
Rajesh Wilson
Bindu Latha Nair R
Sanitha Kuriachan
Mahesh Kumar D
Jumi Jacob
Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
lupus nephritis; mycophenolate mofetil; remission induction; cyclophosphamide; side effects
title Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
title_full Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
title_short Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment: Findings from a prospective observational study
title_sort mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in combination with prednisolone for lupus nephritis induction treatment findings from a prospective observational study
topic lupus nephritis; mycophenolate mofetil; remission induction; cyclophosphamide; side effects
url https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4589
work_keys_str_mv AT rakheshlr mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT priyasraju mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rajeshwilson mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bindulathanairr mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sanithakuriachan mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT maheshkumard mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jumijacob mycophenolatemofetilversuscyclophosphamideincombinationwithprednisoloneforlupusnephritisinductiontreatmentfindingsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy