Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study

Objective. To compare the relative effectiveness of different anti-Rx devices in terms of radiation dose absorbed by operators during percutaneous coronary procedures (diagnostic or interventional). Background. Direct comparisons among different adjunctive anti-Rx devices during percutaneous coronar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Sciahbasi, Nicolò Salvi, Roberto Patrizi, Cristian Di Russo, Maria Cera, Alessandro Bocci, Francesco Starnazzi, Silvio Fedele, Antonino Granatelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8815778
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850185710386020352
author Alessandro Sciahbasi
Nicolò Salvi
Roberto Patrizi
Cristian Di Russo
Maria Cera
Alessandro Bocci
Francesco Starnazzi
Silvio Fedele
Antonino Granatelli
author_facet Alessandro Sciahbasi
Nicolò Salvi
Roberto Patrizi
Cristian Di Russo
Maria Cera
Alessandro Bocci
Francesco Starnazzi
Silvio Fedele
Antonino Granatelli
author_sort Alessandro Sciahbasi
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare the relative effectiveness of different anti-Rx devices in terms of radiation dose absorbed by operators during percutaneous coronary procedures (diagnostic or interventional). Background. Direct comparisons among different adjunctive anti-Rx devices during percutaneous coronary procedures to reduce operator radiation exposure are lacking. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the last 200 percutaneous procedures performed by a single operator according to the use of adjunctive protective devices (group 1) or standard anti-Rx setting (group 2). Subsequently, the procedures in group 1 have been divided according to the protective device utilized (homemade pelvic drape with under-table curtain, or RADPAD drape, or the STAR System device, or the Rampart shield). The primary endpoint was the operator radiation dose at the thorax. Results. Groups 1 and 2 did not show significant differences in terms of anthropometric data or cardiovascular risk factors. The use of adjunctive anti-Rx devices was associated with a significant reduction in operator radiation exposure compared to standard radioprotection (12.8 μSv [7–21] and 22.6 μSv [11–36], respectively; p<0.0001). Globally, the anti-Rx devices utilized were associated with a reduced operator radiation exposure (11.7 μSv [2–19] for homemade drapes, 13.5 μSv [9–29] for RADPAD drape, 15 μSv [11–30] for STAR Board System, and 8 μSv [5–19] for Rampart; p<0.0001) with the homemade drapes and the Rampart system showing a lower operator exposure. Conclusions. The use of anti-Rx devices during percutaneous coronary procedures is associated with a significant lower operator radiation exposure with the greater effect obtained with pelvic drapes and the Rampart system.
format Article
id doaj-art-3e1cc977bce5439d98740af1a3fefabe
institution OA Journals
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-3e1cc977bce5439d98740af1a3fefabe2025-08-20T02:16:39ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832024-01-01202410.1155/2024/8815778Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR StudyAlessandro Sciahbasi0Nicolò Salvi1Roberto Patrizi2Cristian Di Russo3Maria Cera4Alessandro Bocci5Francesco Starnazzi6Silvio Fedele7Antonino Granatelli8Interventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyInterventional CardiologyObjective. To compare the relative effectiveness of different anti-Rx devices in terms of radiation dose absorbed by operators during percutaneous coronary procedures (diagnostic or interventional). Background. Direct comparisons among different adjunctive anti-Rx devices during percutaneous coronary procedures to reduce operator radiation exposure are lacking. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the last 200 percutaneous procedures performed by a single operator according to the use of adjunctive protective devices (group 1) or standard anti-Rx setting (group 2). Subsequently, the procedures in group 1 have been divided according to the protective device utilized (homemade pelvic drape with under-table curtain, or RADPAD drape, or the STAR System device, or the Rampart shield). The primary endpoint was the operator radiation dose at the thorax. Results. Groups 1 and 2 did not show significant differences in terms of anthropometric data or cardiovascular risk factors. The use of adjunctive anti-Rx devices was associated with a significant reduction in operator radiation exposure compared to standard radioprotection (12.8 μSv [7–21] and 22.6 μSv [11–36], respectively; p<0.0001). Globally, the anti-Rx devices utilized were associated with a reduced operator radiation exposure (11.7 μSv [2–19] for homemade drapes, 13.5 μSv [9–29] for RADPAD drape, 15 μSv [11–30] for STAR Board System, and 8 μSv [5–19] for Rampart; p<0.0001) with the homemade drapes and the Rampart system showing a lower operator exposure. Conclusions. The use of anti-Rx devices during percutaneous coronary procedures is associated with a significant lower operator radiation exposure with the greater effect obtained with pelvic drapes and the Rampart system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8815778
spellingShingle Alessandro Sciahbasi
Nicolò Salvi
Roberto Patrizi
Cristian Di Russo
Maria Cera
Alessandro Bocci
Francesco Starnazzi
Silvio Fedele
Antonino Granatelli
Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
title_full Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
title_fullStr Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
title_full_unstemmed Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
title_short Role of Different Adjunctive Protective Devices to Reduce Operator Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: The RAPTOR Study
title_sort role of different adjunctive protective devices to reduce operator radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary procedures the raptor study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8815778
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandrosciahbasi roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT nicolosalvi roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT robertopatrizi roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT cristiandirusso roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT mariacera roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT alessandrobocci roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT francescostarnazzi roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT silviofedele roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy
AT antoninogranatelli roleofdifferentadjunctiveprotectivedevicestoreduceoperatorradiationexposureinpercutaneouscoronaryprocedurestheraptorstudy