Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model

Background: An alarming observation from high-volume obstetric facilities in Nepal indicating a decreased institutional delivery rate and increased institutional neonatal mortality rate after the initial nationwide lockdown signaled the adverse population-level impact of the pandemic on the national...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dinesh Dharel, Deepak Paudel, Nazeem Muhajarine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-07-01
Series:Women's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251347717
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849316929574010880
author Dinesh Dharel
Deepak Paudel
Nazeem Muhajarine
author_facet Dinesh Dharel
Deepak Paudel
Nazeem Muhajarine
author_sort Dinesh Dharel
collection DOAJ
description Background: An alarming observation from high-volume obstetric facilities in Nepal indicating a decreased institutional delivery rate and increased institutional neonatal mortality rate after the initial nationwide lockdown signaled the adverse population-level impact of the pandemic on the national trajectory of neonatal survival. Objectives: We aimed to estimate the impact of change in institutional delivery coverage on cause-specific neonatal mortality during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal. Design: Modeling-based study. Methods: We used the open-access Lives Saved Tool, based on a linear deterministic mathematical model validated for estimating cause-specific neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, to estimate the number of additional neonatal lives saved and neonatal mortality rates. Using coverage change in institutional delivery rates as a proxy for interventions during childbirth, we compared the estimates using ‘reported’ coverage change during the pandemic with the ‘targets’ per Nepal Every Newborn Action Plan. Results: The projected number of additional neonatal lives saved when the pandemic hit the hardest (Nepalese fiscal year 2020–2021) when national annual institutional delivery rate reportedly decreased was lower (104; 95% confidence interval: 69–148) compared to the target scenario (222; 95% confidence interval: 152–313). However, in the next year 2021–2022 when the institutional delivery rate increased, the number was higher (926; 95% confidence interval: 643–1295) compared to target scenario (329; 95% confidence interval: 226–466). The trajectory of the projected neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births reversed (increased to 20.18) in 2020–2021 compared to 20.11 in 2019–2020 and then tracked down to 18.75 in 2021–2022. Most newborn lives would be saved from asphyxia, sepsis, and prematurity-related complications. Neonatal resuscitation, thermal protection, and cord care are the top three lifesaving interventions during childbirth. Conclusion: Neonatal survival in Nepal was adversely impacted during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with a favorable bounce back next year, based on the Lives Saved Tool projection per change in institutional delivery coverage.
format Article
id doaj-art-3df4ce3c1070400bb2f55ce83bf2c725
institution Kabale University
issn 1745-5065
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Women's Health
spelling doaj-art-3df4ce3c1070400bb2f55ce83bf2c7252025-08-20T03:51:25ZengSAGE PublishingWomen's Health1745-50652025-07-012110.1177/17455057251347717Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool modelDinesh Dharel0Deepak Paudel1Nazeem Muhajarine2Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaSave the Children, Kathmandu, NepalDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaBackground: An alarming observation from high-volume obstetric facilities in Nepal indicating a decreased institutional delivery rate and increased institutional neonatal mortality rate after the initial nationwide lockdown signaled the adverse population-level impact of the pandemic on the national trajectory of neonatal survival. Objectives: We aimed to estimate the impact of change in institutional delivery coverage on cause-specific neonatal mortality during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal. Design: Modeling-based study. Methods: We used the open-access Lives Saved Tool, based on a linear deterministic mathematical model validated for estimating cause-specific neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, to estimate the number of additional neonatal lives saved and neonatal mortality rates. Using coverage change in institutional delivery rates as a proxy for interventions during childbirth, we compared the estimates using ‘reported’ coverage change during the pandemic with the ‘targets’ per Nepal Every Newborn Action Plan. Results: The projected number of additional neonatal lives saved when the pandemic hit the hardest (Nepalese fiscal year 2020–2021) when national annual institutional delivery rate reportedly decreased was lower (104; 95% confidence interval: 69–148) compared to the target scenario (222; 95% confidence interval: 152–313). However, in the next year 2021–2022 when the institutional delivery rate increased, the number was higher (926; 95% confidence interval: 643–1295) compared to target scenario (329; 95% confidence interval: 226–466). The trajectory of the projected neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births reversed (increased to 20.18) in 2020–2021 compared to 20.11 in 2019–2020 and then tracked down to 18.75 in 2021–2022. Most newborn lives would be saved from asphyxia, sepsis, and prematurity-related complications. Neonatal resuscitation, thermal protection, and cord care are the top three lifesaving interventions during childbirth. Conclusion: Neonatal survival in Nepal was adversely impacted during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with a favorable bounce back next year, based on the Lives Saved Tool projection per change in institutional delivery coverage.https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251347717
spellingShingle Dinesh Dharel
Deepak Paudel
Nazeem Muhajarine
Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
Women's Health
title Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
title_full Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
title_fullStr Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
title_full_unstemmed Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
title_short Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model
title_sort impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in nepal estimates using lives saved tool model
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251347717
work_keys_str_mv AT dineshdharel impactofreducedinstitutionaldeliverycoverageonneonatalsurvivalduringthepeakofcoronavirusdisease2019pandemicinnepalestimatesusinglivessavedtoolmodel
AT deepakpaudel impactofreducedinstitutionaldeliverycoverageonneonatalsurvivalduringthepeakofcoronavirusdisease2019pandemicinnepalestimatesusinglivessavedtoolmodel
AT nazeemmuhajarine impactofreducedinstitutionaldeliverycoverageonneonatalsurvivalduringthepeakofcoronavirusdisease2019pandemicinnepalestimatesusinglivessavedtoolmodel