Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Abstract Background Integration of artificial intelligence enhances precision, yielding dependable evaluations of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction despite image quality variations. Commercial software like HeartModelAI provides fully automated 3DE quantification, simplifying the measur...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04355-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850163259957575680 |
|---|---|
| author | Mahboobeh Sheikh Sahar Asl Fallah Muhammadhosein Moradi Arash Jalali Ahmad Vakili-Basir Mohammad Sahebjam Haleh Ashraf Arezou Zoroufian |
| author_facet | Mahboobeh Sheikh Sahar Asl Fallah Muhammadhosein Moradi Arash Jalali Ahmad Vakili-Basir Mohammad Sahebjam Haleh Ashraf Arezou Zoroufian |
| author_sort | Mahboobeh Sheikh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Integration of artificial intelligence enhances precision, yielding dependable evaluations of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction despite image quality variations. Commercial software like HeartModelAI provides fully automated 3DE quantification, simplifying the measurement of left chamber volumes and ejection fraction. In this manuscript, we present a cross-sectional study to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated 3D echocardiography (HeartModelAI) to the standard Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy referring to the Tehran Heart Center with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and comprehensive 3D transthoracic echocardiography within 24 h were included. All 3D volume analysis was performed with fully automated quantification software (HeartModelAI) using 3D images of 2,3, and 4-chamber views at the end of systole and diastole. Results Excellent Inter- and Intra-observer correlation coefficient was reported for HeartModelAI software for all indexes. HeartModelAI displayed a remarkable correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance for left ventricular end-systolic volume index (r = 0.918 and r = 0.911); nevertheless, it underestimated left ventricular end-systolic volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. Conversely, ejection fraction, stroke volume, and left ventricular mass were overestimated. It was found that manual contour correction can enhance the accuracy of automated model estimations, particularly concerning EF in participants needing correction. Conclusion HeartModelAI software emerges as a rapid and viable imaging approach for evaluating the left ventricle’s structure and function. In our study, LV volumes assessed by HeartModelAI demonstrated strong correlations with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3deb60e2e01a486d9dc39cb4943139b1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1471-2261 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
| spelling | doaj-art-3deb60e2e01a486d9dc39cb4943139b12025-08-20T02:22:20ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612024-11-0124111110.1186/s12872-024-04355-3Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathyMahboobeh Sheikh0Sahar Asl Fallah1Muhammadhosein Moradi2Arash Jalali3Ahmad Vakili-Basir4Mohammad Sahebjam5Haleh Ashraf6Arezou Zoroufian7Zabol University of Medical SciencesCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical SciencesCardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background Integration of artificial intelligence enhances precision, yielding dependable evaluations of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction despite image quality variations. Commercial software like HeartModelAI provides fully automated 3DE quantification, simplifying the measurement of left chamber volumes and ejection fraction. In this manuscript, we present a cross-sectional study to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated 3D echocardiography (HeartModelAI) to the standard Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy referring to the Tehran Heart Center with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and comprehensive 3D transthoracic echocardiography within 24 h were included. All 3D volume analysis was performed with fully automated quantification software (HeartModelAI) using 3D images of 2,3, and 4-chamber views at the end of systole and diastole. Results Excellent Inter- and Intra-observer correlation coefficient was reported for HeartModelAI software for all indexes. HeartModelAI displayed a remarkable correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance for left ventricular end-systolic volume index (r = 0.918 and r = 0.911); nevertheless, it underestimated left ventricular end-systolic volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. Conversely, ejection fraction, stroke volume, and left ventricular mass were overestimated. It was found that manual contour correction can enhance the accuracy of automated model estimations, particularly concerning EF in participants needing correction. Conclusion HeartModelAI software emerges as a rapid and viable imaging approach for evaluating the left ventricle’s structure and function. In our study, LV volumes assessed by HeartModelAI demonstrated strong correlations with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04355-3Dilated cardiomyopathyMagnetic resonance imagingEchocardiography |
| spellingShingle | Mahboobeh Sheikh Sahar Asl Fallah Muhammadhosein Moradi Arash Jalali Ahmad Vakili-Basir Mohammad Sahebjam Haleh Ashraf Arezou Zoroufian Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Dilated cardiomyopathy Magnetic resonance imaging Echocardiography |
| title | Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| title_full | Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| title_fullStr | Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| title_short | Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| title_sort | comparing heartmodelai and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy |
| topic | Dilated cardiomyopathy Magnetic resonance imaging Echocardiography |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04355-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mahboobehsheikh comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT saharaslfallah comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT muhammadhoseinmoradi comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT arashjalali comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT ahmadvakilibasir comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT mohammadsahebjam comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT halehashraf comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy AT arezouzoroufian comparingheartmodelaiandcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingforleftventricularvolumeandfunctionevaluationinpatientswithdilatedcardiomyopathy |