Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joeri Meyns, Jindanil Thanatchaporn, Sohaib Shujaat, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-04-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849761020101263360
author Joeri Meyns
Jindanil Thanatchaporn
Sohaib Shujaat
Constantinus Politis
Reinhilde Jacobs
author_facet Joeri Meyns
Jindanil Thanatchaporn
Sohaib Shujaat
Constantinus Politis
Reinhilde Jacobs
author_sort Joeri Meyns
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better skeletal control and patient compliance. However, strong evidence supporting these advantages is limited. Methods Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants: 28 growing Class III patients (mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years) in mixed dentition with skeletal class III malocclusion. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either hybrid hyrax with facemask (HH + FM, n = 14) or hybrid hyrax with mentoplate (HH + MP, n = 14). All received Alt-RAMEC protocol expansion. FM group used 360–400 g/side elastic traction 12–14 h daily; MP group used 185 g/side continuous traction. Objective: To compare 5-year three-dimensional (3D) skeletal effects between HH + FM and HH + MP protocols. Outcome: Primary outcome was 3D volumetric changes of upper and lower jaw at 1 year (T1) and 5 years (T2) post-treatment, measured using low-dose CT scans. Randomization: 28 patients were allocated to either treatment-protocols using sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was generated with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Blinding: Due to the nature of the trial, the operator and children could not be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, blinding was used when assessing the outcomes. Results Follow-up: one patient was lost at the one-year follow-up and an additional three patients were lost at the 5-year-follow-up. Outcomes: At T2 (5 years), maxillary advancement was identical between both groups (0.85 mm ± 0.5). Mandibular growth control showed minimal difference (FM: − 0.01 mm ± 0.24; MP: 0.10 mm ± 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any skeletal measurements (p > 0.05). Male patients showed lager mandibular changes both signed (p < 0.03) and unsigned (p < 0.01). Harms: minor harms were encountered with the anchor hooks (fracture or mucosal irritation), however none led to treatment cessation. Conclusions Both protocols demonstrated comparable long-term skeletal effects in Class III correction. Treatment choice should be based on individual patient factors rather than assumed mechanical advantages.
format Article
id doaj-art-3dd2c05e598642129d0dd9803b211e6d
institution DOAJ
issn 2196-1042
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Progress in Orthodontics
spelling doaj-art-3dd2c05e598642129d0dd9803b211e6d2025-08-20T03:06:09ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422025-04-0126111210.1186/s40510-025-00561-7Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trialJoeri Meyns0Jindanil Thanatchaporn1Sohaib Shujaat2Constantinus Politis3Reinhilde Jacobs4Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgKU LeuvenKU LeuvenKU LeuvenKU LeuvenAbstract Background Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better skeletal control and patient compliance. However, strong evidence supporting these advantages is limited. Methods Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants: 28 growing Class III patients (mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years) in mixed dentition with skeletal class III malocclusion. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either hybrid hyrax with facemask (HH + FM, n = 14) or hybrid hyrax with mentoplate (HH + MP, n = 14). All received Alt-RAMEC protocol expansion. FM group used 360–400 g/side elastic traction 12–14 h daily; MP group used 185 g/side continuous traction. Objective: To compare 5-year three-dimensional (3D) skeletal effects between HH + FM and HH + MP protocols. Outcome: Primary outcome was 3D volumetric changes of upper and lower jaw at 1 year (T1) and 5 years (T2) post-treatment, measured using low-dose CT scans. Randomization: 28 patients were allocated to either treatment-protocols using sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was generated with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Blinding: Due to the nature of the trial, the operator and children could not be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, blinding was used when assessing the outcomes. Results Follow-up: one patient was lost at the one-year follow-up and an additional three patients were lost at the 5-year-follow-up. Outcomes: At T2 (5 years), maxillary advancement was identical between both groups (0.85 mm ± 0.5). Mandibular growth control showed minimal difference (FM: − 0.01 mm ± 0.24; MP: 0.10 mm ± 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any skeletal measurements (p > 0.05). Male patients showed lager mandibular changes both signed (p < 0.03) and unsigned (p < 0.01). Harms: minor harms were encountered with the anchor hooks (fracture or mucosal irritation), however none led to treatment cessation. Conclusions Both protocols demonstrated comparable long-term skeletal effects in Class III correction. Treatment choice should be based on individual patient factors rather than assumed mechanical advantages.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7
spellingShingle Joeri Meyns
Jindanil Thanatchaporn
Sohaib Shujaat
Constantinus Politis
Reinhilde Jacobs
Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
Progress in Orthodontics
title Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort long term three dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing class iii patients a randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7
work_keys_str_mv AT joerimeyns longtermthreedimensionalskeletaleffectsofhybridhyraxwithfacemaskversusmentoplateingrowingclassiiipatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jindanilthanatchaporn longtermthreedimensionalskeletaleffectsofhybridhyraxwithfacemaskversusmentoplateingrowingclassiiipatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sohaibshujaat longtermthreedimensionalskeletaleffectsofhybridhyraxwithfacemaskversusmentoplateingrowingclassiiipatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT constantinuspolitis longtermthreedimensionalskeletaleffectsofhybridhyraxwithfacemaskversusmentoplateingrowingclassiiipatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reinhildejacobs longtermthreedimensionalskeletaleffectsofhybridhyraxwithfacemaskversusmentoplateingrowingclassiiipatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial