Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language
The development of an efficient lingware, for any language, requires first the modeling and the formalisation of the linguistic knowledge of it. In fact, a multitude of grammatical formalisms exist, however none of them had made the unanimity of specialists of the domain. This raised the problem of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Scientific and Technological Research Center for the Development of the Arabic Language
2011-12-01
|
| Series: | Al-Lisaniyyat |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.crstdla.dz/ojs/index.php/allj/article/view/455 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849425238513680384 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdelmadjid Achit Hamid Azzoune |
| author_facet | Abdelmadjid Achit Hamid Azzoune |
| author_sort | Abdelmadjid Achit |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The development of an efficient lingware, for any language, requires first the modeling and the formalisation of the linguistic knowledge of it. In fact, a multitude of grammatical formalisms exist, however none of them had made the unanimity of specialists of the domain. This raised the problem of choosing the most appropriate formalism for representing linguistic constructions of that language. Thus, this paper is about the discussion of the aptitude of the Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar GPSG and the Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar HPSG to represent the different analysis' levels of the arabic language. So, a comparative study is carried out between these two formalisms, in order to evaluate their capacities to represent and give account of the different analysis' levels of the arabic by taking foundations on an arabic linguistic theory. This study aims to select between these two formalisms, on the very definite criteria , the one that will be adopted to act as basis to the conception of our NLP tools for the arabic language processing. This work succeeds to the fact that HPSG as a formalism representing the different analysis' levels of the arabic is more recommended than GPSG. Thus, it was established that HPSG proposes a richer and more organized lexicon than GPSG. Also, regarding the representation of arabic syntactic constructions, HPSG offers a more elegant representation, more general and more economic in term of cost: type and number of used rules.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3db55059bbd44bfbb8b0230d021952f5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1112-4393 2588-2031 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
| publisher | Scientific and Technological Research Center for the Development of the Arabic Language |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Al-Lisaniyyat |
| spelling | doaj-art-3db55059bbd44bfbb8b0230d021952f52025-08-20T03:29:49ZaraScientific and Technological Research Center for the Development of the Arabic LanguageAl-Lisaniyyat1112-43932588-20312011-12-0117210.61850/allj.v17i2.455Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic LanguageAbdelmadjid Achit0Hamid Azzoune1Scientific and technical research center for the development of the Arabic languageHouari Boumèdiene USTHB University The development of an efficient lingware, for any language, requires first the modeling and the formalisation of the linguistic knowledge of it. In fact, a multitude of grammatical formalisms exist, however none of them had made the unanimity of specialists of the domain. This raised the problem of choosing the most appropriate formalism for representing linguistic constructions of that language. Thus, this paper is about the discussion of the aptitude of the Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar GPSG and the Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar HPSG to represent the different analysis' levels of the arabic language. So, a comparative study is carried out between these two formalisms, in order to evaluate their capacities to represent and give account of the different analysis' levels of the arabic by taking foundations on an arabic linguistic theory. This study aims to select between these two formalisms, on the very definite criteria , the one that will be adopted to act as basis to the conception of our NLP tools for the arabic language processing. This work succeeds to the fact that HPSG as a formalism representing the different analysis' levels of the arabic is more recommended than GPSG. Thus, it was established that HPSG proposes a richer and more organized lexicon than GPSG. Also, regarding the representation of arabic syntactic constructions, HPSG offers a more elegant representation, more general and more economic in term of cost: type and number of used rules. https://www.crstdla.dz/ojs/index.php/allj/article/view/455Natural language processing NLP, Unification grammar, HPSG, GPSG, syntactic analysis, arabic language processing, comparative syntax |
| spellingShingle | Abdelmadjid Achit Hamid Azzoune Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language Al-Lisaniyyat Natural language processing NLP, Unification grammar, HPSG, GPSG, syntactic analysis, arabic language processing, comparative syntax |
| title | Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language |
| title_full | Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language |
| title_fullStr | Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language |
| title_full_unstemmed | Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language |
| title_short | Similarities And Differences Between Gpsg And Hpsg Grammars Applied To The Arabic Language |
| title_sort | similarities and differences between gpsg and hpsg grammars applied to the arabic language |
| topic | Natural language processing NLP, Unification grammar, HPSG, GPSG, syntactic analysis, arabic language processing, comparative syntax |
| url | https://www.crstdla.dz/ojs/index.php/allj/article/view/455 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelmadjidachit similaritiesanddifferencesbetweengpsgandhpsggrammarsappliedtothearabiclanguage AT hamidazzoune similaritiesanddifferencesbetweengpsgandhpsggrammarsappliedtothearabiclanguage |