An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model

Since the 1988 amendment of the 10 CFR 50.46 rule in 1988, Westinghouse has been developing and applying realistic or best-estimate methods to perform LOCA safety analyses. A realistic analysis requires the execution of various realistic LOCA transient simulations where the effect of both model and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cesare Frepoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/498737
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849304730484867072
author Cesare Frepoli
author_facet Cesare Frepoli
author_sort Cesare Frepoli
collection DOAJ
description Since the 1988 amendment of the 10 CFR 50.46 rule in 1988, Westinghouse has been developing and applying realistic or best-estimate methods to perform LOCA safety analyses. A realistic analysis requires the execution of various realistic LOCA transient simulations where the effect of both model and input uncertainties are ranged and propagated throughout the transients. The outcome is typically a range of results with associated probabilities. The thermal/hydraulic code is the engine of the methodology but a procedure is developed to assess the code and determine its biases and uncertainties. In addition, inputs to the simulation are also affected by uncertainty and these uncertainties are incorporated into the process. Several approaches have been proposed and applied in the industry in the framework of best-estimate methods. Most of the implementations, including Westinghouse, follow the Code Scaling, Applicability and Uncertainty (CSAU) methodology. Westinghouse methodology is based on the use of the WCOBRA/TRAC thermal-hydraulic code. The paper starts with an overview of the regulations and its interpretation in the context of realistic analysis. The CSAU roadmap is reviewed in the context of its implementation in the Westinghouse evaluation model. An overview of the code (WCOBRA/TRAC) and methodology is provided. Finally, the recent evolution to nonparametric statistics in the current edition of the W methodology is discussed. Sample results of a typical large break LOCA analysis for a PWR are provided.
format Article
id doaj-art-3da9d1ed71bf425b96edd467b83360bc
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
language English
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
spelling doaj-art-3da9d1ed71bf425b96edd467b83360bc2025-08-20T03:55:40ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832008-01-01200810.1155/2008/498737498737An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation ModelCesare Frepoli0LOCA Integrated Services I, Westinghouse Electric Company, Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0350, USASince the 1988 amendment of the 10 CFR 50.46 rule in 1988, Westinghouse has been developing and applying realistic or best-estimate methods to perform LOCA safety analyses. A realistic analysis requires the execution of various realistic LOCA transient simulations where the effect of both model and input uncertainties are ranged and propagated throughout the transients. The outcome is typically a range of results with associated probabilities. The thermal/hydraulic code is the engine of the methodology but a procedure is developed to assess the code and determine its biases and uncertainties. In addition, inputs to the simulation are also affected by uncertainty and these uncertainties are incorporated into the process. Several approaches have been proposed and applied in the industry in the framework of best-estimate methods. Most of the implementations, including Westinghouse, follow the Code Scaling, Applicability and Uncertainty (CSAU) methodology. Westinghouse methodology is based on the use of the WCOBRA/TRAC thermal-hydraulic code. The paper starts with an overview of the regulations and its interpretation in the context of realistic analysis. The CSAU roadmap is reviewed in the context of its implementation in the Westinghouse evaluation model. An overview of the code (WCOBRA/TRAC) and methodology is provided. Finally, the recent evolution to nonparametric statistics in the current edition of the W methodology is discussed. Sample results of a typical large break LOCA analysis for a PWR are provided.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/498737
spellingShingle Cesare Frepoli
An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
title An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
title_full An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
title_fullStr An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
title_short An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model
title_sort overview of westinghouse realistic large break loca evaluation model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/498737
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarefrepoli anoverviewofwestinghouserealisticlargebreaklocaevaluationmodel
AT cesarefrepoli overviewofwestinghouserealisticlargebreaklocaevaluationmodel