Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria

Understanding how environmental variability shapes crop biomass is essential for improving yield stability and guiding climate-resilient agriculture. To address this, we compared biomass estimates from a semi-empirical light use efficiency (LUE) model with predictions from a machine learning–remote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maninder Singh Dhillon, Thomas Koellner, Sarah Asam, Jakob Bogenreuther, Stefan Dech, Ursula Gessner, Daniel Gruschwitz, Sylvia Helena Annuth, Tanja Kraus, Thomas Rummler, Christian Schaefer, Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Martina Wilde, Tobias Ullmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630087/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850036143025815552
author Maninder Singh Dhillon
Thomas Koellner
Sarah Asam
Jakob Bogenreuther
Stefan Dech
Stefan Dech
Ursula Gessner
Daniel Gruschwitz
Sylvia Helena Annuth
Tanja Kraus
Thomas Rummler
Christian Schaefer
Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Martina Wilde
Martina Wilde
Tobias Ullmann
author_facet Maninder Singh Dhillon
Thomas Koellner
Sarah Asam
Jakob Bogenreuther
Stefan Dech
Stefan Dech
Ursula Gessner
Daniel Gruschwitz
Sylvia Helena Annuth
Tanja Kraus
Thomas Rummler
Christian Schaefer
Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Martina Wilde
Martina Wilde
Tobias Ullmann
author_sort Maninder Singh Dhillon
collection DOAJ
description Understanding how environmental variability shapes crop biomass is essential for improving yield stability and guiding climate-resilient agriculture. To address this, we compared biomass estimates from a semi-empirical light use efficiency (LUE) model with predictions from a machine learning–remote sensing framework that integrates environmental variables. We applied a combined LUE and random forest (RF) model to estimate the mean biomass of winter wheat and oilseed rape across Bavaria, Germany, from 2001 to 2019. Using a 5 km2 hexagon-based grid, we incorporated landscape metrics (land cover diversity, small woody features), topographic variables (elevation, slope, aspect), soil potential, and seasonal climate predictors (mean and standard deviation of temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation) across the growing season. The RF-based approach improved predictive accuracy over the LUE model alone, particularly for winter wheat. Biomass patterns were shaped by both landscape configuration and climatic conditions. Winter wheat biomass was more influenced by topographic and landscape features, while oilseed rape was more sensitive to solar radiation and soil properties. Moderately diverse landscapes supported higher biomass, whereas an extreme landscape fragmentation or high variability showed lower values. Temperature thresholds, above 21 °C for winter wheat and 12 °C for oilseed rape, were associated with biomass declines, indicating crop-specific sensitivities under Bavarian conditions. This hybrid modeling approach provides a transferable framework to map and understand crop biomass dynamics at scale. The findings offer region-specific insights that can support sustainable agricultural planning in the context of climate change.
format Article
id doaj-art-3d8e1cf1c65a434082d0a30dc98d77dc
institution DOAJ
issn 1664-462X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj-art-3d8e1cf1c65a434082d0a30dc98d77dc2025-08-20T02:57:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2025-08-011610.3389/fpls.2025.16300871630087Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of BavariaManinder Singh Dhillon0Thomas Koellner1Sarah Asam2Jakob Bogenreuther3Stefan Dech4Stefan Dech5Ursula Gessner6Daniel Gruschwitz7Sylvia Helena Annuth8Tanja Kraus9Thomas Rummler10Christian Schaefer11Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt12Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter13Martina Wilde14Martina Wilde15Tobias Ullmann16Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Ecological Services, Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyGerman Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Wessling, GermanyDepartment of Ecological Services, Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyGerman Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Wessling, GermanyGerman Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Wessling, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Ecological Services, Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyGerman Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Wessling, GermanyDepartment of Applied Computer Science, Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Physical Geography and Soil Science, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyUnderstanding how environmental variability shapes crop biomass is essential for improving yield stability and guiding climate-resilient agriculture. To address this, we compared biomass estimates from a semi-empirical light use efficiency (LUE) model with predictions from a machine learning–remote sensing framework that integrates environmental variables. We applied a combined LUE and random forest (RF) model to estimate the mean biomass of winter wheat and oilseed rape across Bavaria, Germany, from 2001 to 2019. Using a 5 km2 hexagon-based grid, we incorporated landscape metrics (land cover diversity, small woody features), topographic variables (elevation, slope, aspect), soil potential, and seasonal climate predictors (mean and standard deviation of temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation) across the growing season. The RF-based approach improved predictive accuracy over the LUE model alone, particularly for winter wheat. Biomass patterns were shaped by both landscape configuration and climatic conditions. Winter wheat biomass was more influenced by topographic and landscape features, while oilseed rape was more sensitive to solar radiation and soil properties. Moderately diverse landscapes supported higher biomass, whereas an extreme landscape fragmentation or high variability showed lower values. Temperature thresholds, above 21 °C for winter wheat and 12 °C for oilseed rape, were associated with biomass declines, indicating crop-specific sensitivities under Bavarian conditions. This hybrid modeling approach provides a transferable framework to map and understand crop biomass dynamics at scale. The findings offer region-specific insights that can support sustainable agricultural planning in the context of climate change.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630087/fullcrop biomass modelinglandscape diversityclimate variabilityrandom forest regressionsmall woody featuresclimate-resilient agriculture
spellingShingle Maninder Singh Dhillon
Thomas Koellner
Sarah Asam
Jakob Bogenreuther
Stefan Dech
Stefan Dech
Ursula Gessner
Daniel Gruschwitz
Sylvia Helena Annuth
Tanja Kraus
Thomas Rummler
Christian Schaefer
Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Martina Wilde
Martina Wilde
Tobias Ullmann
Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
Frontiers in Plant Science
crop biomass modeling
landscape diversity
climate variability
random forest regression
small woody features
climate-resilient agriculture
title Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
title_full Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
title_fullStr Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
title_full_unstemmed Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
title_short Landscape structure, climate variability, and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of Bavaria
title_sort landscape structure climate variability and soil quality shape crop biomass patterns in agricultural ecosystems of bavaria
topic crop biomass modeling
landscape diversity
climate variability
random forest regression
small woody features
climate-resilient agriculture
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630087/full
work_keys_str_mv AT manindersinghdhillon landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT thomaskoellner landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT sarahasam landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT jakobbogenreuther landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT stefandech landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT stefandech landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT ursulagessner landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT danielgruschwitz landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT sylviahelenaannuth landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT tanjakraus landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT thomasrummler landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT christianschaefer landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT sarahschonbrodtstitt landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT ingolfsteffandewenter landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT martinawilde landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT martinawilde landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria
AT tobiasullmann landscapestructureclimatevariabilityandsoilqualityshapecropbiomasspatternsinagriculturalecosystemsofbavaria