Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial

Introduction: Numerous multimodal pain protocols have been developed to optimize pain control, reduce narcotics consumption, and shorten the length of stay after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been postulated to reduce narcotic requirements after arthroplas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen Joseph, Rainey Joshua P., Linthicum Jonathan, Blackburn Brenna E., Anderson Lucas A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2025-01-01
Series:SICOT-J
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2025/01/sicotj240146/sicotj240146.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850272662093299712
author Bowen Joseph
Rainey Joshua P.
Linthicum Jonathan
Blackburn Brenna E.
Anderson Lucas A.
author_facet Bowen Joseph
Rainey Joshua P.
Linthicum Jonathan
Blackburn Brenna E.
Anderson Lucas A.
author_sort Bowen Joseph
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Numerous multimodal pain protocols have been developed to optimize pain control, reduce narcotics consumption, and shorten the length of stay after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been postulated to reduce narcotic requirements after arthroplasty but is not without additional cost. The aim of this study was to determine if the addition of LB to our standard periarticular injection would improve postoperative pain and shorten the length of stay in patients undergoing TKA or THA. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized, blinded non-inferiority study of patients undergoing THA and TKA. Patients were randomized to a periarticular injection with and without LB. There were 118 hips and 64 knees included in the study with no demographic differences between groups. Post-operative pain management was performed by a second provider who was blinded to the patient’s experimental group designation. Results: Cost analysis determined that LB increased cost by $305 dollars per patient when accounting for the cost of injections as well as intravenous and oral pain medications. LB led to a minor reduction in narcotic use in THA patients (equivalent to a single 10 mg oxycodone dose), but this difference may lack clinical relevance. No significant benefits were observed in TKA patients. No difference was identified in self-reported pain scores or lengths of hospital stay. Discussion: The addition of LB did not significantly reduce narcotic consumption in patients undergoing TKA, while the cost of LB is prohibitive and should be considered an area of potential cost savings by surgeons and hospitals. The minor reduction in narcotic use in patients undergoing THA likely lacks clinical significance.
format Article
id doaj-art-3d54ddfcd3e948f0b0f8ebc9a74c038d
institution OA Journals
issn 2426-8887
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series SICOT-J
spelling doaj-art-3d54ddfcd3e948f0b0f8ebc9a74c038d2025-08-20T01:51:44ZengEDP SciencesSICOT-J2426-88872025-01-01111710.1051/sicotj/2025012sicotj240146Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trialBowen Joseph0Rainey Joshua P.1Linthicum Jonathan2Blackburn Brenna E.3Anderson Lucas A.4Kootenai Health, 2003 Kootenai Health WayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of UtahKootenai Health, 2003 Kootenai Health WayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of UtahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of UtahIntroduction: Numerous multimodal pain protocols have been developed to optimize pain control, reduce narcotics consumption, and shorten the length of stay after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been postulated to reduce narcotic requirements after arthroplasty but is not without additional cost. The aim of this study was to determine if the addition of LB to our standard periarticular injection would improve postoperative pain and shorten the length of stay in patients undergoing TKA or THA. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized, blinded non-inferiority study of patients undergoing THA and TKA. Patients were randomized to a periarticular injection with and without LB. There were 118 hips and 64 knees included in the study with no demographic differences between groups. Post-operative pain management was performed by a second provider who was blinded to the patient’s experimental group designation. Results: Cost analysis determined that LB increased cost by $305 dollars per patient when accounting for the cost of injections as well as intravenous and oral pain medications. LB led to a minor reduction in narcotic use in THA patients (equivalent to a single 10 mg oxycodone dose), but this difference may lack clinical relevance. No significant benefits were observed in TKA patients. No difference was identified in self-reported pain scores or lengths of hospital stay. Discussion: The addition of LB did not significantly reduce narcotic consumption in patients undergoing TKA, while the cost of LB is prohibitive and should be considered an area of potential cost savings by surgeons and hospitals. The minor reduction in narcotic use in patients undergoing THA likely lacks clinical significance.https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2025/01/sicotj240146/sicotj240146.htmlliposomal bupivacainetotal hip arthroplastytotal knee arthroplastyopioid
spellingShingle Bowen Joseph
Rainey Joshua P.
Linthicum Jonathan
Blackburn Brenna E.
Anderson Lucas A.
Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
SICOT-J
liposomal bupivacaine
total hip arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
opioid
title Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
title_full Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
title_short Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
title_sort liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized non inferiority trial
topic liposomal bupivacaine
total hip arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
opioid
url https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2025/01/sicotj240146/sicotj240146.html
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenjoseph liposomalbupivacaineversusstandardperiarticularinjectionsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT raineyjoshuap liposomalbupivacaineversusstandardperiarticularinjectionsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT linthicumjonathan liposomalbupivacaineversusstandardperiarticularinjectionsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT blackburnbrennae liposomalbupivacaineversusstandardperiarticularinjectionsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT andersonlucasa liposomalbupivacaineversusstandardperiarticularinjectionsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrial