Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable

Introduction. Histopathological assessment of liver biopsies is the current “gold standard” for diagnosing graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT), as graft dysfunction can have nonspecific clinical presentations and inconsistent patterns of liver biochemical dysfunction. Most commonly, p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Eghtedari, Catriona McKenzie, Lauren C. Y. Tang, Avik Majumdar, James G. Kench
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3103335
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850186078967824384
author Maryam Eghtedari
Catriona McKenzie
Lauren C. Y. Tang
Avik Majumdar
James G. Kench
author_facet Maryam Eghtedari
Catriona McKenzie
Lauren C. Y. Tang
Avik Majumdar
James G. Kench
author_sort Maryam Eghtedari
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Histopathological assessment of liver biopsies is the current “gold standard” for diagnosing graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT), as graft dysfunction can have nonspecific clinical presentations and inconsistent patterns of liver biochemical dysfunction. Most commonly, post-LT, graft dysfunction within the first year, is due to acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) which is characterised histologically by the degree of portal inflammation (PI), bile duct damage (BDD), and venous endothelial inflammation (VEI). This study aimed to establish the relationship between global assessment, which is the global grading of rejection using a “gestalt” approach, and the rejection activity index (RAI) of each component of TCMR as described in revised Banff 2016 guidelines. Methods. Liver biopsies (n = 90) taken from patients who underwent LT in 2015 and 2016 at the Australian National Liver Transplant Unit were identified from the electronic medical records. All biopsy slides were microscopically graded by at least two assessors independently using the revised 2016 Banff criteria. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS v21. A Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was performed to assess the correlation between the global assessment and the RAI scores for each TCMR biopsy. Results. Within the cohort, 60 (37%, n = 164) patients underwent at least 1 biopsy within 12 months after LT. The most common biopsy outcome (total n = 90) was acute TCMR (64, 71.1%). Global assessment of TCMR slides strongly positively correlated with PI (p value <0.001), BDD (p value <0.001), VEI (p value <0.001), and total RAI (p value <0.001). Liver biochemistry of patients with TCMR significantly improved within 4 to 6 weeks post-biopsy compared to the day of the biopsy. Conclusion. In acute TCMR, global assessment and total RAI are strongly correlated and can be used interchangeably to describe the severity of TCMR.
format Article
id doaj-art-3d518d51ba2e45baaf9a24f2964fb847
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-0015
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-3d518d51ba2e45baaf9a24f2964fb8472025-08-20T02:16:29ZengWileyJournal of Transplantation2090-00152023-01-01202310.1155/2023/3103335Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are InterchangeableMaryam Eghtedari0Catriona McKenzie1Lauren C. Y. Tang2Avik Majumdar3James G. Kench4Central Clinical SchoolCentral Clinical SchoolAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver CentreCentral Clinical SchoolCentral Clinical SchoolIntroduction. Histopathological assessment of liver biopsies is the current “gold standard” for diagnosing graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT), as graft dysfunction can have nonspecific clinical presentations and inconsistent patterns of liver biochemical dysfunction. Most commonly, post-LT, graft dysfunction within the first year, is due to acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) which is characterised histologically by the degree of portal inflammation (PI), bile duct damage (BDD), and venous endothelial inflammation (VEI). This study aimed to establish the relationship between global assessment, which is the global grading of rejection using a “gestalt” approach, and the rejection activity index (RAI) of each component of TCMR as described in revised Banff 2016 guidelines. Methods. Liver biopsies (n = 90) taken from patients who underwent LT in 2015 and 2016 at the Australian National Liver Transplant Unit were identified from the electronic medical records. All biopsy slides were microscopically graded by at least two assessors independently using the revised 2016 Banff criteria. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS v21. A Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was performed to assess the correlation between the global assessment and the RAI scores for each TCMR biopsy. Results. Within the cohort, 60 (37%, n = 164) patients underwent at least 1 biopsy within 12 months after LT. The most common biopsy outcome (total n = 90) was acute TCMR (64, 71.1%). Global assessment of TCMR slides strongly positively correlated with PI (p value <0.001), BDD (p value <0.001), VEI (p value <0.001), and total RAI (p value <0.001). Liver biochemistry of patients with TCMR significantly improved within 4 to 6 weeks post-biopsy compared to the day of the biopsy. Conclusion. In acute TCMR, global assessment and total RAI are strongly correlated and can be used interchangeably to describe the severity of TCMR.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3103335
spellingShingle Maryam Eghtedari
Catriona McKenzie
Lauren C. Y. Tang
Avik Majumdar
James G. Kench
Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
Journal of Transplantation
title Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
title_full Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
title_fullStr Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
title_full_unstemmed Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
title_short Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable
title_sort banff 2016 global assessment and quantitative scoring for t cell mediated liver transplant rejection are interchangeable
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3103335
work_keys_str_mv AT maryameghtedari banff2016globalassessmentandquantitativescoringfortcellmediatedlivertransplantrejectionareinterchangeable
AT catrionamckenzie banff2016globalassessmentandquantitativescoringfortcellmediatedlivertransplantrejectionareinterchangeable
AT laurencytang banff2016globalassessmentandquantitativescoringfortcellmediatedlivertransplantrejectionareinterchangeable
AT avikmajumdar banff2016globalassessmentandquantitativescoringfortcellmediatedlivertransplantrejectionareinterchangeable
AT jamesgkench banff2016globalassessmentandquantitativescoringfortcellmediatedlivertransplantrejectionareinterchangeable