Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations

Aerosols are critical to the Earth’s atmosphere, influencing climate through interactions with solar radiation and clouds. However, accurately replicating the interactions between aerosols and clouds remains challenging due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. This study evaluated t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiakun Liang, Jennifer D. Small Griswold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2439
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849733763440836608
author Jiakun Liang
Jennifer D. Small Griswold
author_facet Jiakun Liang
Jennifer D. Small Griswold
author_sort Jiakun Liang
collection DOAJ
description Aerosols are critical to the Earth’s atmosphere, influencing climate through interactions with solar radiation and clouds. However, accurately replicating the interactions between aerosols and clouds remains challenging due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. This study evaluated the performance of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating aerosol optical depth (AOD), cloud fraction (CF), and liquid water path (LWP) by comparing them with satellite observations from MODIS and AMSR-E. Using 30 years of CMIP6 model simulations and available satellite observations during the satellite era, the results show that most CMIP6 models underestimate CF and LWP by 24.3% for LWP in the Northern Hemisphere. An assessment of spatial patterns indicates that models generally align more closely with observations in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere. Latitudinal profiles reveal that while most models capture the overall distribution patterns, they struggle to accurately reproduce observed magnitudes. A quantitative scoring system is applied to evaluate each model’s ability to replicate the spatial characteristics of multi-year mean aerosol and cloud properties. Overall, the findings suggest that CMIP6 models perform better in simulating AOD and CF than LWP, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere.
format Article
id doaj-art-3d4e2b0b20664f5b9b29e57446ebf974
institution DOAJ
issn 2072-4292
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-3d4e2b0b20664f5b9b29e57446ebf9742025-08-20T03:07:58ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922025-07-011714243910.3390/rs17142439Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite ObservationsJiakun Liang0Jennifer D. Small Griswold1Atmospheric Sciences Department, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, 2525 Correa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822, USAAtmospheric Sciences Department, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, 2525 Correa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822, USAAerosols are critical to the Earth’s atmosphere, influencing climate through interactions with solar radiation and clouds. However, accurately replicating the interactions between aerosols and clouds remains challenging due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. This study evaluated the performance of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating aerosol optical depth (AOD), cloud fraction (CF), and liquid water path (LWP) by comparing them with satellite observations from MODIS and AMSR-E. Using 30 years of CMIP6 model simulations and available satellite observations during the satellite era, the results show that most CMIP6 models underestimate CF and LWP by 24.3% for LWP in the Northern Hemisphere. An assessment of spatial patterns indicates that models generally align more closely with observations in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere. Latitudinal profiles reveal that while most models capture the overall distribution patterns, they struggle to accurately reproduce observed magnitudes. A quantitative scoring system is applied to evaluate each model’s ability to replicate the spatial characteristics of multi-year mean aerosol and cloud properties. Overall, the findings suggest that CMIP6 models perform better in simulating AOD and CF than LWP, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2439CMIP6satelliteaerosolcloud
spellingShingle Jiakun Liang
Jennifer D. Small Griswold
Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
Remote Sensing
CMIP6
satellite
aerosol
cloud
title Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
title_full Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
title_fullStr Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
title_short Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth, Cloud Fraction, and Liquid Water Path in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations
title_sort assessment of aerosol optical depth cloud fraction and liquid water path in cmip6 models using satellite observations
topic CMIP6
satellite
aerosol
cloud
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2439
work_keys_str_mv AT jiakunliang assessmentofaerosolopticaldepthcloudfractionandliquidwaterpathincmip6modelsusingsatelliteobservations
AT jenniferdsmallgriswold assessmentofaerosolopticaldepthcloudfractionandliquidwaterpathincmip6modelsusingsatelliteobservations