Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Introduction The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods A retrospective register‐based cohort study with b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Wagenius, Sophia Ehrström, Karin Källén, Jan Baekelandt, Andrea Stuart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15099
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850115663458205696
author Johanna Wagenius
Sophia Ehrström
Karin Källén
Jan Baekelandt
Andrea Stuart
author_facet Johanna Wagenius
Sophia Ehrström
Karin Källén
Jan Baekelandt
Andrea Stuart
author_sort Johanna Wagenius
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods A retrospective register‐based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014–2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non‐prolapse, non‐endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low‐risk and a standard group, with the low‐risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot‐assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH). Results The rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021–2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low‐risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low‐risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05–1.46) compared to VH in the low‐risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00–2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46–3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12–1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16–0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding >500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low‐risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time <45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). Conclusions A decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014–2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low‐risk hysterectomies.
format Article
id doaj-art-3d329f8fbf5c433fba625422c5249b40
institution OA Journals
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-3d329f8fbf5c433fba625422c5249b402025-08-20T02:36:31ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122025-05-01104595896710.1111/aogs.15099Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort studyJohanna Wagenius0Sophia Ehrström1Karin Källén2Jan Baekelandt3Andrea Stuart4Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Lund University Lund SwedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Danderyd Hospital Danderyd SwedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center of Reproduction, Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute Lund University Lund SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Imelda Hospital Bonheiden BelgiumInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Lund University Lund SwedenAbstract Introduction The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods A retrospective register‐based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014–2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non‐prolapse, non‐endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low‐risk and a standard group, with the low‐risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot‐assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH). Results The rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021–2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low‐risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low‐risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05–1.46) compared to VH in the low‐risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00–2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46–3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12–1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16–0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding >500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low‐risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time <45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). Conclusions A decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014–2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low‐risk hysterectomies.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15099complicationscostminimally invasive surgerysurgical outcomevaginal hysterectomy
spellingShingle Johanna Wagenius
Sophia Ehrström
Karin Källén
Jan Baekelandt
Andrea Stuart
Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
complications
cost
minimally invasive surgery
surgical outcome
vaginal hysterectomy
title Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low‐risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort why not vaginal nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low risk hysterectomies a retrospective cohort study
topic complications
cost
minimally invasive surgery
surgical outcome
vaginal hysterectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15099
work_keys_str_mv AT johannawagenius whynotvaginalnationwidetrendsandsurgicaloutcomesinlowriskhysterectomiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sophiaehrstrom whynotvaginalnationwidetrendsandsurgicaloutcomesinlowriskhysterectomiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT karinkallen whynotvaginalnationwidetrendsandsurgicaloutcomesinlowriskhysterectomiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT janbaekelandt whynotvaginalnationwidetrendsandsurgicaloutcomesinlowriskhysterectomiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT andreastuart whynotvaginalnationwidetrendsandsurgicaloutcomesinlowriskhysterectomiesaretrospectivecohortstudy