Reassessing the validity of using weighted linear models to implement multi-generational GWAS-by-subtraction: a response to Evans et al.
Abstract Evans and colleagues for providing a critique on our article “Deriving GWAS summary estimates for paternal smoking in UK biobank: a GWAS by subtraction”. They highlight important limitations in our approach, which we overlooked. They argue that our approach works neither in theory nor in pr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Benjamin Woolf, Dipender Gill, Marcus Munafò, Stephen Burgess |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | BMC Research Notes |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07327-8 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Deriving GWAS summary estimates for paternal smoking in UK biobank: a GWAS by subtraction
by: Benjamin Woolf, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Correction: Deriving GWAS summary estimates for paternal smoking in UK biobank: a GWAS by subtraction
by: Benjamin Woolf, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Woolf et al’s “GWAS by subtraction” is not useful for cross-generational Mendelian randomization studies
by: David M Evans, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Has GWAS lost its status as a paragon of open science?
by: Callie Burt, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
The evolution of mendelian randomization for investigating drug effects.
by: Dipender Gill, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)