Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?

Soil water movement is energy-dependent and is influenced by various management practices. It can be understood by measuring the soil water potential (SWP); however, the influence of cover crops (CCs) on SWP is not currently well understood. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivia M. Peters, Samuel I. Haruna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/11/2549
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850217964245090304
author Olivia M. Peters
Samuel I. Haruna
author_facet Olivia M. Peters
Samuel I. Haruna
author_sort Olivia M. Peters
collection DOAJ
description Soil water movement is energy-dependent and is influenced by various management practices. It can be understood by measuring the soil water potential (SWP); however, the influence of cover crops (CCs) on SWP is not currently well understood. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of CCs on SWP before and after termination in order to understand their effects on soil water availability for the subsequent cash crop. The experimental design was a completely randomized design with two levels of CCs (CCs vs. no cover crop [NC]) with three replicates. The SWP sensors were buried at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depths before CCs were planted. Additionally, soil samples were collected at the aforementioned depths just before CC termination for soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K<sub>sat</sub>) analysis. Results showed that CCs increased SOC and K<sub>sat</sub>, and significantly lowered BD compared with NC management. Before termination, CC plots had significantly lower SWP values compared with NC management, suggesting that the transpirational needs of the CCs can lead to lower water content. After termination, CC management also resulted in lower SWP, suggesting that CCs can increase water-use efficiency by improving soil health parameters. However, effective planning is required for CC implementation, especially in semiarid and arid regions.
format Article
id doaj-art-3cb9bde7252b46049c4fe7d09289644d
institution OA Journals
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-3cb9bde7252b46049c4fe7d09289644d2025-08-20T02:07:56ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952024-10-011411254910.3390/agronomy14112549Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?Olivia M. Peters0Samuel I. Haruna1USDA-NRCS, 1907 N. Gateway Blvd., Suite 101, Fresno, CA 93727-1677, USASchool of Agriculture, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 East Main Street, Murfreesboro, TN 37132-0001, USASoil water movement is energy-dependent and is influenced by various management practices. It can be understood by measuring the soil water potential (SWP); however, the influence of cover crops (CCs) on SWP is not currently well understood. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of CCs on SWP before and after termination in order to understand their effects on soil water availability for the subsequent cash crop. The experimental design was a completely randomized design with two levels of CCs (CCs vs. no cover crop [NC]) with three replicates. The SWP sensors were buried at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depths before CCs were planted. Additionally, soil samples were collected at the aforementioned depths just before CC termination for soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K<sub>sat</sub>) analysis. Results showed that CCs increased SOC and K<sub>sat</sub>, and significantly lowered BD compared with NC management. Before termination, CC plots had significantly lower SWP values compared with NC management, suggesting that the transpirational needs of the CCs can lead to lower water content. After termination, CC management also resulted in lower SWP, suggesting that CCs can increase water-use efficiency by improving soil health parameters. However, effective planning is required for CC implementation, especially in semiarid and arid regions.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/11/2549bulk densitysaturated hydraulic conductivitysoil organic carbonsoil water content
spellingShingle Olivia M. Peters
Samuel I. Haruna
Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
Agronomy
bulk density
saturated hydraulic conductivity
soil organic carbon
soil water content
title Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
title_full Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
title_fullStr Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
title_full_unstemmed Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
title_short Do Cover Crops Influence In Situ Soil Water Potential After Termination?
title_sort do cover crops influence in situ soil water potential after termination
topic bulk density
saturated hydraulic conductivity
soil organic carbon
soil water content
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/11/2549
work_keys_str_mv AT oliviampeters docovercropsinfluenceinsitusoilwaterpotentialaftertermination
AT samueliharuna docovercropsinfluenceinsitusoilwaterpotentialaftertermination