The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an “ischemic time” of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current tre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chai KS, Faisham WI, Wan-Sulaiman WA, Rosli MA, Mat-Saad AZ, Jusoh MH, Paiman M, Halim AS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2025-03-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.morthoj.org/2025/v19n1/vascular-injury.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849703912340193280
author Chai KS
Faisham WI
Wan-Sulaiman WA
Rosli MA
Mat-Saad AZ
Jusoh MH
Paiman M
Halim AS
author_facet Chai KS
Faisham WI
Wan-Sulaiman WA
Rosli MA
Mat-Saad AZ
Jusoh MH
Paiman M
Halim AS
author_sort Chai KS
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an “ischemic time” of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current treatment approach and assess areas for future improvement. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on a highly selected group of patients who underwent delayed revascularization surgery for lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries in our institution from January 2008 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria include the presence of a terminal non-salvageable ischemic limb; defined as a gangrenous extremity evident by non-blanchable, mottled skin with complete limb paralysis, renal trauma, known renal impairment, and those with an ischemic time less than 6 hours. The demographic data, type and level of vascular, type of injuries, duration of ischemia, MESS score, and the need for secondary amputation were assessed. Result: Fifty-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. Fifty patients (84.7%) were male, while 9 patients (15.3%) were female. The mean age was 28.1 years. The most injured vessel was the popliteal artery (n=41, 69.5%). The commonest injury pattern was contusion with thrombosis (n=31, 52.5%). Revascularizations were mainly achieved by interposition saphenous vein graft (n=40, 67.8%). The mean duration of delayed was 14.1 hours. A total of 83.1% of patients (n=49) had a Mangled Extremity Severity Scoring (MESS) of 7 and above. The limb salvage rate in this study was 89.8%, with only 6 patients (12.2%) requiring secondary amputations. Thirty-one patients developed rhabdomyolysis, with 6 cases (19.4%) requiring temporary inpatient renal replacement therapy (RRT). Out of the six, only one patient required lifelong RRT. Conclusions: Limb salvage in those with the duration of delayed of more than 6 hours should be attempted after careful assessment and a high rate of limb salvage, minimal renal complication and acceptable functional (mobility) outcomes can be achieved, despite the reperfusion injury that accompanies.
format Article
id doaj-art-3cb8dd2094b643b6917829ff98f79b45
institution DOAJ
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format Article
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
spelling doaj-art-3cb8dd2094b643b6917829ff98f79b452025-08-20T03:17:02ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2025-03-011911910.5704/MOJ.2503.008The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort StudyChai KS0Faisham WI1 Wan-Sulaiman WA2 Rosli MA3Mat-Saad AZ4 Jusoh MH5Paiman M6 Halim AS7Reconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaReconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaReconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaReconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaReconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MalaysiaIntroduction: There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an “ischemic time” of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current treatment approach and assess areas for future improvement. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on a highly selected group of patients who underwent delayed revascularization surgery for lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries in our institution from January 2008 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria include the presence of a terminal non-salvageable ischemic limb; defined as a gangrenous extremity evident by non-blanchable, mottled skin with complete limb paralysis, renal trauma, known renal impairment, and those with an ischemic time less than 6 hours. The demographic data, type and level of vascular, type of injuries, duration of ischemia, MESS score, and the need for secondary amputation were assessed. Result: Fifty-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. Fifty patients (84.7%) were male, while 9 patients (15.3%) were female. The mean age was 28.1 years. The most injured vessel was the popliteal artery (n=41, 69.5%). The commonest injury pattern was contusion with thrombosis (n=31, 52.5%). Revascularizations were mainly achieved by interposition saphenous vein graft (n=40, 67.8%). The mean duration of delayed was 14.1 hours. A total of 83.1% of patients (n=49) had a Mangled Extremity Severity Scoring (MESS) of 7 and above. The limb salvage rate in this study was 89.8%, with only 6 patients (12.2%) requiring secondary amputations. Thirty-one patients developed rhabdomyolysis, with 6 cases (19.4%) requiring temporary inpatient renal replacement therapy (RRT). Out of the six, only one patient required lifelong RRT. Conclusions: Limb salvage in those with the duration of delayed of more than 6 hours should be attempted after careful assessment and a high rate of limb salvage, minimal renal complication and acceptable functional (mobility) outcomes can be achieved, despite the reperfusion injury that accompanies. https://www.morthoj.org/2025/v19n1/vascular-injury.pdfvascular system injurieslower extremityrhabdomyolysisrenal dialysisamputation
spellingShingle Chai KS
Faisham WI
Wan-Sulaiman WA
Rosli MA
Mat-Saad AZ
Jusoh MH
Paiman M
Halim AS
The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
vascular system injuries
lower extremity
rhabdomyolysis
renal dialysis
amputation
title The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort outcomes of delayed revascularization in lower extremity vascular injury a retrospective cohort study
topic vascular system injuries
lower extremity
rhabdomyolysis
renal dialysis
amputation
url https://www.morthoj.org/2025/v19n1/vascular-injury.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chaiks theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT faishamwi theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wansulaimanwa theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT roslima theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT matsaadaz theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jusohmh theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT paimanm theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT halimas theoutcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chaiks outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT faishamwi outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wansulaimanwa outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT roslima outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT matsaadaz outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jusohmh outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT paimanm outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT halimas outcomesofdelayedrevascularizationinlowerextremityvascularinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy