Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula

The Lula government considerably amplified and diversified the Support to Family Agriculture Program (PRONAF), created by the Fernando Henrique Cardoso government in 1995. This long term choice for family agriculture can surprise in Brazil, a country which has always, throughout its history, privile...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Philippe Tonneau, Eric Sabourin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Confins 2009-03-01
Series:Confins
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/confins/5575
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841542781510615040
author Jean Philippe Tonneau
Eric Sabourin
author_facet Jean Philippe Tonneau
Eric Sabourin
author_sort Jean Philippe Tonneau
collection DOAJ
description The Lula government considerably amplified and diversified the Support to Family Agriculture Program (PRONAF), created by the Fernando Henrique Cardoso government in 1995. This long term choice for family agriculture can surprise in Brazil, a country which has always, throughout its history, privileged the entrepreneurial agriculture: latifundia and agricultural businesses.The article analyzes the mechanisms which led to these choices, by examining in particular the role of the trade-union and country organizations in the "construction" of the Support to Family Agriculture Program (PRONAF) and of the Durable Development of the Rural Territories Programme (PDSTR). The permanence of family agriculture in the Brazilian history is explained by its adaptation and resistance capacity, even towards unrealistic projects of modernization which did not take into account the comparative advantages of family agriculture. This capacity of adaptation is born from an daily experimentation, in stories of "local development". Groups of farmers test techniques, practicies or organizations. The dynamism of these movements in made natural partners of the State in the development and the implementation of the PRONAF.Beyond the difficulties and lack of means, in the daily relations between actors, a way to implementat PRONAF was invented. A new governance was instituted between social movement and government. For the MDA, and more particularly, for the Secretariat of Territorial Development (SDT), the territory is the privileged place of this news governance.PRONAF and PDSTR are representative of what tends to become the public policies to answer the challenges of a future, increasingly more dubious. They are good examples of programs co-defined in continuity (four successive governments), where dialogue allowed pragmatism, decentralization and training to impose themselves in an adaptative practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-3c96ad37d7ae40ce9160714707a70468
institution Kabale University
issn 1958-9212
language English
publishDate 2009-03-01
publisher Confins
record_format Article
series Confins
spelling doaj-art-3c96ad37d7ae40ce9160714707a704682025-01-13T15:55:23ZengConfinsConfins1958-92122009-03-01510.4000/confins.5575Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de LulaJean Philippe TonneauEric SabourinThe Lula government considerably amplified and diversified the Support to Family Agriculture Program (PRONAF), created by the Fernando Henrique Cardoso government in 1995. This long term choice for family agriculture can surprise in Brazil, a country which has always, throughout its history, privileged the entrepreneurial agriculture: latifundia and agricultural businesses.The article analyzes the mechanisms which led to these choices, by examining in particular the role of the trade-union and country organizations in the "construction" of the Support to Family Agriculture Program (PRONAF) and of the Durable Development of the Rural Territories Programme (PDSTR). The permanence of family agriculture in the Brazilian history is explained by its adaptation and resistance capacity, even towards unrealistic projects of modernization which did not take into account the comparative advantages of family agriculture. This capacity of adaptation is born from an daily experimentation, in stories of "local development". Groups of farmers test techniques, practicies or organizations. The dynamism of these movements in made natural partners of the State in the development and the implementation of the PRONAF.Beyond the difficulties and lack of means, in the daily relations between actors, a way to implementat PRONAF was invented. A new governance was instituted between social movement and government. For the MDA, and more particularly, for the Secretariat of Territorial Development (SDT), the territory is the privileged place of this news governance.PRONAF and PDSTR are representative of what tends to become the public policies to answer the challenges of a future, increasingly more dubious. They are good examples of programs co-defined in continuity (four successive governments), where dialogue allowed pragmatism, decentralization and training to impose themselves in an adaptative practice.https://journals.openedition.org/confins/5575Family agriculturepublic policiesgovernanceterritoryPRONAF
spellingShingle Jean Philippe Tonneau
Eric Sabourin
Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
Confins
Family agriculture
public policies
governance
territory
PRONAF
title Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
title_full Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
title_fullStr Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
title_full_unstemmed Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
title_short Agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de développement territorial : le cas du Brésil de Lula
title_sort agriculture familiale et politiques publiques de developpement territorial le cas du bresil de lula
topic Family agriculture
public policies
governance
territory
PRONAF
url https://journals.openedition.org/confins/5575
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanphilippetonneau agriculturefamilialeetpolitiquespubliquesdedeveloppementterritoriallecasdubresildelula
AT ericsabourin agriculturefamilialeetpolitiquespubliquesdedeveloppementterritoriallecasdubresildelula