Polarity of Yelp Reviews: A BERT–LSTM Comparative Study

With the rapid growth in social network comments, the need for more effective methods to classify their polarity—negative, neutral, or positive—has become essential. Sentiment analysis, powered by natural language processing, has evolved significantly with the adoption of advanced deep learning tech...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachid Belaroussi, Sié Cyriac Noufe, Francis Dupin, Pierre-Olivier Vandanjon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/9/5/140
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:With the rapid growth in social network comments, the need for more effective methods to classify their polarity—negative, neutral, or positive—has become essential. Sentiment analysis, powered by natural language processing, has evolved significantly with the adoption of advanced deep learning techniques. Long Short-Term Memory networks capture long-range dependencies in text, while transformers, with their attention mechanisms, excel at preserving contextual meaning and handling high-dimensional, semantically complex data. This study compares the performance of sentiment analysis models based on LSTM and BERT architectures using key evaluation metrics. The dataset consists of business reviews from the Yelp Open Dataset. We tested LSTM-based methods against BERT and its variants—RoBERTa, BERTweet, and DistilBERT—leveraging popular pipelines from the Hugging Face Hub. A class-by-class performance analysis is presented, revealing that more complex BERT-based models do not always guarantee superior results in the classification of Yelp reviews. Additionally, the use of bidirectionality in LSTMs does not necessarily lead to better performance. However, across a diversity of test sets, transformer models outperform traditional RNN-based models, as their generalization capability is greater than that of a simple LSTM model.
ISSN:2504-2289