Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance

PurposeThis study aims to assess the reliability of subjective evaluations conducted under two information conditions and to explore the influence of observer expertise on the consistency of performance assessments of elite table tennis players.MethodsObservers of varying skill levels were invited t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lulu Gan, Jing Chen, Luning Wang, Yunfei Lu, Jie Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432711/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849710519312711680
author Lulu Gan
Jing Chen
Luning Wang
Yunfei Lu
Jie Ren
author_facet Lulu Gan
Jing Chen
Luning Wang
Yunfei Lu
Jie Ren
author_sort Lulu Gan
collection DOAJ
description PurposeThis study aims to assess the reliability of subjective evaluations conducted under two information conditions and to explore the influence of observer expertise on the consistency of performance assessments of elite table tennis players.MethodsObservers of varying skill levels were invited to provide subjective evaluations of the elite table tennis players’ performance by observing specific rally strokes during the match. A Video Masking Paradigm approach was implemented to conceal motion information during critical moments of scoring and losing. The weighted Kappa coefficient (k) was employed to evaluate the inter-observer consistency between two observers. The Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (w) is a measure of inter-rater agreement, specifically used for ordinal scales (e.g., Likert five-point scale) when multiple raters are involved.ResultsIntra-observer reliability was good (r = 0.61–0.86), whereas inter-observer consistency between the two observers was low (k = 0.01–0.39). Among the observation indicators, the advanced group showed the lowest consistency in evaluating tactical behavior (without results, w = 0.44; with results, w = 0.76). Experiment 2: The consistency of the observers in the without results condition (expert group w = 0.75 vs. advanced group w = 0.57 vs. novice group w = 0.66) is lower than in the with results (expert group w = 0.84 vs. advanced group w = 0.78 vs. novice group w = 0.76). Across all three observation indicators, namely stroke quality, tactical intention, and competitive posture, the expert group demonstrated the highest level of consistency, followed by the advanced group, while the novice group exhibited the lowest level of agreement.ConclusionObservers with table tennis skill levels demonstrate high intra-observer test–retest reliability in subjective evaluations, but the inter-observer consistency is lower. Different information conditions (with or without results) are key variables affecting the consistency of subjective evaluations. When kinematic information is occluded (without results), the consistency of subjective evaluations decreases. The selection of observation indicators also impacts the consistency of subjective evaluations. Additionally, observers’ consistency in subjective evaluations is influenced by their level of experience and skill: the higher the observer’s level and experience, the greater the consistency of their subjective evaluations.
format Article
id doaj-art-3c32c7ab9df84679a52cd1999174b46e
institution DOAJ
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj-art-3c32c7ab9df84679a52cd1999174b46e2025-08-20T03:14:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-06-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.14327111432711Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performanceLulu Gan0Jing Chen1Luning Wang2Yunfei Lu3Jie Ren4China Table Tennis College, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaDivision of Health Professions, Texas A&M University–Texarkana, Texarkana, TX, United StatesSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaChina Table Tennis College, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaChina Table Tennis College, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaPurposeThis study aims to assess the reliability of subjective evaluations conducted under two information conditions and to explore the influence of observer expertise on the consistency of performance assessments of elite table tennis players.MethodsObservers of varying skill levels were invited to provide subjective evaluations of the elite table tennis players’ performance by observing specific rally strokes during the match. A Video Masking Paradigm approach was implemented to conceal motion information during critical moments of scoring and losing. The weighted Kappa coefficient (k) was employed to evaluate the inter-observer consistency between two observers. The Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (w) is a measure of inter-rater agreement, specifically used for ordinal scales (e.g., Likert five-point scale) when multiple raters are involved.ResultsIntra-observer reliability was good (r = 0.61–0.86), whereas inter-observer consistency between the two observers was low (k = 0.01–0.39). Among the observation indicators, the advanced group showed the lowest consistency in evaluating tactical behavior (without results, w = 0.44; with results, w = 0.76). Experiment 2: The consistency of the observers in the without results condition (expert group w = 0.75 vs. advanced group w = 0.57 vs. novice group w = 0.66) is lower than in the with results (expert group w = 0.84 vs. advanced group w = 0.78 vs. novice group w = 0.76). Across all three observation indicators, namely stroke quality, tactical intention, and competitive posture, the expert group demonstrated the highest level of consistency, followed by the advanced group, while the novice group exhibited the lowest level of agreement.ConclusionObservers with table tennis skill levels demonstrate high intra-observer test–retest reliability in subjective evaluations, but the inter-observer consistency is lower. Different information conditions (with or without results) are key variables affecting the consistency of subjective evaluations. When kinematic information is occluded (without results), the consistency of subjective evaluations decreases. The selection of observation indicators also impacts the consistency of subjective evaluations. Additionally, observers’ consistency in subjective evaluations is influenced by their level of experience and skill: the higher the observer’s level and experience, the greater the consistency of their subjective evaluations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432711/fullsports performancetable tenniselite athletereliabilitysubjective evaluation
spellingShingle Lulu Gan
Jing Chen
Luning Wang
Yunfei Lu
Jie Ren
Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
Frontiers in Psychology
sports performance
table tennis
elite athlete
reliability
subjective evaluation
title Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
title_full Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
title_fullStr Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
title_short Reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players’ performance
title_sort reliability of subjective evaluation in assessing elite table tennis players performance
topic sports performance
table tennis
elite athlete
reliability
subjective evaluation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432711/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lulugan reliabilityofsubjectiveevaluationinassessingelitetabletennisplayersperformance
AT jingchen reliabilityofsubjectiveevaluationinassessingelitetabletennisplayersperformance
AT luningwang reliabilityofsubjectiveevaluationinassessingelitetabletennisplayersperformance
AT yunfeilu reliabilityofsubjectiveevaluationinassessingelitetabletennisplayersperformance
AT jieren reliabilityofsubjectiveevaluationinassessingelitetabletennisplayersperformance