Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah
This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported b...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/afkaruna/article/view/24555 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832576606642634752 |
|---|---|
| author | Sholihul Huda Zuly Qodir Nafik Muthohirin Warsidi Warsidi |
| author_facet | Sholihul Huda Zuly Qodir Nafik Muthohirin Warsidi Warsidi |
| author_sort | Sholihul Huda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3b77e94141674ecca040b87ef69eef6b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2599-0551 2599-0586 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-3b77e94141674ecca040b87ef69eef6b2025-01-31T04:12:12ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaAfkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies2599-05512599-05862024-12-0120227829910.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.2455520307Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in MuhammadiyahSholihul Huda0Zuly Qodir1Nafik Muthohirin2Warsidi Warsidi3Universitas Muhammadiyah SurabayaUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaEötvös Loránd University, BudapestUniversitas Muhammadiyah SurabayaThis study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/afkaruna/article/view/24555muhammadiyahapostasyinclusiveexclusivedidactic. |
| spellingShingle | Sholihul Huda Zuly Qodir Nafik Muthohirin Warsidi Warsidi Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies muhammadiyah apostasy inclusive exclusive didactic. |
| title | Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah |
| title_full | Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah |
| title_fullStr | Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah |
| title_full_unstemmed | Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah |
| title_short | Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah |
| title_sort | inclusive exclusive didactic typologies of islamic thought on apostasy in muhammadiyah |
| topic | muhammadiyah apostasy inclusive exclusive didactic. |
| url | https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/afkaruna/article/view/24555 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sholihulhuda inclusiveexclusivedidactictypologiesofislamicthoughtonapostasyinmuhammadiyah AT zulyqodir inclusiveexclusivedidactictypologiesofislamicthoughtonapostasyinmuhammadiyah AT nafikmuthohirin inclusiveexclusivedidactictypologiesofislamicthoughtonapostasyinmuhammadiyah AT warsidiwarsidi inclusiveexclusivedidactictypologiesofislamicthoughtonapostasyinmuhammadiyah |