Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

<h4>Background</h4>The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on Gastric carcinoma (GC) has been extensively studied, while its survival and surgical benefits remain controversial. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A-Man Xu, Lei Huang, Wei Liu, Shuang Gao, Wen-Xiu Han, Zhi-Jian Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086941
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849411883454431232
author A-Man Xu
Lei Huang
Wei Liu
Shuang Gao
Wen-Xiu Han
Zhi-Jian Wei
author_facet A-Man Xu
Lei Huang
Wei Liu
Shuang Gao
Wen-Xiu Han
Zhi-Jian Wei
author_sort A-Man Xu
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on Gastric carcinoma (GC) has been extensively studied, while its survival and surgical benefits remain controversial. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing efficacy, safety and other outcomes of NAC followed by surgery with surgery alone (SA) for GC.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Springer for RCTs comparing NAC with SA when treating GC. Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases were also searched. Primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year survival rates, survival time, and total and perioperative mortalities. Secondary outcomes included down-staging effects, R0 resection rate, and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible comparing items using relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) according to type of data. NAC-related objective response, safety and toxicity were also specifically analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 9 RCTs comparing NAC (n = 511) with SA (n = 545) published from 1995 to 2010 were identified. SA tended to be accompanied with higher overall mortality rate than NAC (46.03% vs 40.61%, RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65-1.06, P = 0.14). Significantly, higher incidence of cases without regional lymph node metastasis observed upon resection were achieved among patients receiving NAC than those undergoing SA (25.68% vs 16.95%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.20-3.06, P = 0.006). All other parameters were comparable. Of the evaluable patients, 43.0% demonstrated either complete or partial response. The comprehensive NAC-related side-effect rate was 18.2% among patients available for safety assessment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>NAC contributes to lowering nodal stages, and potentially reduces overall mortality. Response rate may be an important influential factor impacting advantages, with chemotherapy-related adverse effects as a drawback. This level 1a evidence doesn't support NAC to outweigh SA in terms of survival and surgical benefits when dealing with GC.
format Article
id doaj-art-3b54a5a1eb8a4aa1bda4e5173299f384
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-3b54a5a1eb8a4aa1bda4e5173299f3842025-08-20T03:34:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8694110.1371/journal.pone.0086941Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.A-Man XuLei HuangWei LiuShuang GaoWen-Xiu HanZhi-Jian Wei<h4>Background</h4>The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on Gastric carcinoma (GC) has been extensively studied, while its survival and surgical benefits remain controversial. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing efficacy, safety and other outcomes of NAC followed by surgery with surgery alone (SA) for GC.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Springer for RCTs comparing NAC with SA when treating GC. Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases were also searched. Primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year survival rates, survival time, and total and perioperative mortalities. Secondary outcomes included down-staging effects, R0 resection rate, and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible comparing items using relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) according to type of data. NAC-related objective response, safety and toxicity were also specifically analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 9 RCTs comparing NAC (n = 511) with SA (n = 545) published from 1995 to 2010 were identified. SA tended to be accompanied with higher overall mortality rate than NAC (46.03% vs 40.61%, RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65-1.06, P = 0.14). Significantly, higher incidence of cases without regional lymph node metastasis observed upon resection were achieved among patients receiving NAC than those undergoing SA (25.68% vs 16.95%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.20-3.06, P = 0.006). All other parameters were comparable. Of the evaluable patients, 43.0% demonstrated either complete or partial response. The comprehensive NAC-related side-effect rate was 18.2% among patients available for safety assessment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>NAC contributes to lowering nodal stages, and potentially reduces overall mortality. Response rate may be an important influential factor impacting advantages, with chemotherapy-related adverse effects as a drawback. This level 1a evidence doesn't support NAC to outweigh SA in terms of survival and surgical benefits when dealing with GC.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086941
spellingShingle A-Man Xu
Lei Huang
Wei Liu
Shuang Gao
Wen-Xiu Han
Zhi-Jian Wei
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
title Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086941
work_keys_str_mv AT amanxu neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT leihuang neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weiliu neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shuanggao neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wenxiuhan neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhijianwei neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbysurgeryversussurgeryaloneforgastriccarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials