The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction

Structures include elements designated as load bearing and non-load bearing. While non-load bearing elements, such as facades and internal partitions, are acknowledged to add mass to the system, the structural stiffness and strength is generally attributed to load bearing elements only. This paper i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Devin, P.J. Fanning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-2012-0711
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849304948233207808
author A. Devin
P.J. Fanning
author_facet A. Devin
P.J. Fanning
author_sort A. Devin
collection DOAJ
description Structures include elements designated as load bearing and non-load bearing. While non-load bearing elements, such as facades and internal partitions, are acknowledged to add mass to the system, the structural stiffness and strength is generally attributed to load bearing elements only. This paper investigates the contribution of non-load bearing elements to the dynamic response of a new structure, the Charles Institute, in the grounds of University College Dublin (UCD) Ireland. The vertical vibration response of the first floor and the lateral response at each floor level were recorded at different construction stages. The evolution of the structural response as well as the generation of a finite element (FE) model is discussed. It was found that the addition of the non-load bearing facades increased the first floor natural frequency from 10.7 Hz to 11.4?Hz, a change of approximately +6.5%. Similarly these external facades resulted in the first sway mode having its frequency increased by 6%. The subsequent addition of internal partitions, mechanical services and furnishings resulted in the floor natural frequency reducing to 9.2 Hz. It is concluded that external facades have the net effect of adding stiffness and the effect of internal partitions and furnishings is to add mass. In the context of finite element modelling of structures there is a significant challenge to represent these non-structural elements correctly so as to enable the generation of truly predictive FE models.
format Article
id doaj-art-3b47bcddf4de4eedbbda754b770e52af
institution Kabale University
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Shock and Vibration
spelling doaj-art-3b47bcddf4de4eedbbda754b770e52af2025-08-20T03:55:36ZengWileyShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032012-01-011951051105910.3233/SAV-2012-0711The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during ConstructionA. Devin0P.J. Fanning1School of Architecture, Landscape and Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandSchool of Architecture, Landscape and Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandStructures include elements designated as load bearing and non-load bearing. While non-load bearing elements, such as facades and internal partitions, are acknowledged to add mass to the system, the structural stiffness and strength is generally attributed to load bearing elements only. This paper investigates the contribution of non-load bearing elements to the dynamic response of a new structure, the Charles Institute, in the grounds of University College Dublin (UCD) Ireland. The vertical vibration response of the first floor and the lateral response at each floor level were recorded at different construction stages. The evolution of the structural response as well as the generation of a finite element (FE) model is discussed. It was found that the addition of the non-load bearing facades increased the first floor natural frequency from 10.7 Hz to 11.4?Hz, a change of approximately +6.5%. Similarly these external facades resulted in the first sway mode having its frequency increased by 6%. The subsequent addition of internal partitions, mechanical services and furnishings resulted in the floor natural frequency reducing to 9.2 Hz. It is concluded that external facades have the net effect of adding stiffness and the effect of internal partitions and furnishings is to add mass. In the context of finite element modelling of structures there is a significant challenge to represent these non-structural elements correctly so as to enable the generation of truly predictive FE models.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-2012-0711
spellingShingle A. Devin
P.J. Fanning
The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
Shock and Vibration
title The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
title_full The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
title_fullStr The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
title_full_unstemmed The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
title_short The Evolving Dynamic Response of a Four Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure during Construction
title_sort evolving dynamic response of a four storey reinforced concrete structure during construction
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-2012-0711
work_keys_str_mv AT adevin theevolvingdynamicresponseofafourstoreyreinforcedconcretestructureduringconstruction
AT pjfanning theevolvingdynamicresponseofafourstoreyreinforcedconcretestructureduringconstruction
AT adevin evolvingdynamicresponseofafourstoreyreinforcedconcretestructureduringconstruction
AT pjfanning evolvingdynamicresponseofafourstoreyreinforcedconcretestructureduringconstruction