Statistical Modeling of Wall Roughness and Its Influence on NLOS VLC Channels in Underground Mining

This study investigates the impact of wall roughness on the performance of the Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) component in Visible Light Communication (VLC) systems designed for underground mining environments, adhering to safety and communication standards such as IEC 60079-28(intrinsic safety in explosi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Cornejo, Pablo Palacios Játiva, Cesar Azurdia Meza, Iván Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/5/2364
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the impact of wall roughness on the performance of the Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) component in Visible Light Communication (VLC) systems designed for underground mining environments, adhering to safety and communication standards such as IEC 60079-28(intrinsic safety in explosive atmospheres) and IEEE 802.15.7 (VLC parameters). Using probabilistic models aligned with the ITU-R P.1238 propagation guidelines, the research evaluates how wall materials (e.g., coal, shale, limestone) and their irregular geometries, characterized by surface roughness profiles compliant with ISO 8503-2,influence reflection coefficients (0.05–0.85 range), incidence angles (0°–90°), and irradiance angles (5°–180°), which are critical for signal propagation. Simulation scenarios, parameterized with material reflectivity data from ASTM E423, explore the effects of statistical distributions (uniform, normal with <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>μ</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.3, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.2; exponential <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>λ</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 2; gamma <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>α</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.5, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>β</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.2) on power distribution, channel impulse response, and reflection coefficients. The results indicate variations in maximum received power: a decrease of 80% for uniform distribution, an increase of 150% for exponential distribution, and a 100% increase for gamma distribution in reflection conditions. Under incidence and irradiance conditions, uniform distribution exhibited a 158.62% increase, whereas exponential distribution and gamma distribution experienced reductions of 72.22% and 7.04%, respectively. These variations align with IEC 62973-1 EMI limits and emphasize the role of roughness (Ra = 0.8–12.5 μm per ASME B46.1).
ISSN:2076-3417