Prognostic and predictive values of a multimodal nomogram incorporating tumor and peritumor morphology with immune status in resectable lung adenocarcinoma
Background Current prognostic and predictive biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) predominantly rely on unimodal approaches, limiting their characterization ability. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive and accurate biomarker to guide individualized adjuvant therapy decisions.Methods In...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
| Online Access: | https://jitc.bmj.com/content/13/3/e010723.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background Current prognostic and predictive biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) predominantly rely on unimodal approaches, limiting their characterization ability. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive and accurate biomarker to guide individualized adjuvant therapy decisions.Methods In this retrospective study, data from patients with resectable LUAD (stage I–III) were collected from two hospitals and a publicly available dataset, forming a training dataset (n=223), a validation dataset (n=95), a testing dataset (n=449), and the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Radiogenomics dataset (n=59). Tumor and peritumor scores were constructed from preoperative CT radiomics features (shape/intensity/texture). An immune score was derived from the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within the cancer epithelium and stroma on hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images. A clinical score was constructed based on clinicopathological risk factors. A Cox regression model was employed to integrate these scores, thereby constructing a multimodal nomogram to predict disease-free survival (DFS). The adjuvant chemotherapy benefit rate was subsequently calculated based on this nomogram.Results The multimodal nomogram outperformed each of the unimodal scores in predicting DFS, with a C-index of 0.769 (vs 0.634–0.731) in the training dataset, 0.730 (vs 0.548–0.713) in the validation dataset, and 0.751 (vs 0.660–0.692) in the testing dataset. It was independently associated with DFS after adjusting for other clinicopathological risk factors (training dataset: HR=3.02, p<0.001; validation dataset: HR=2.33, p<0.001; testing dataset: HR=2.03, p=0.001). The adjuvant chemotherapy benefit rate effectively distinguished between patients benefiting from adjuvant chemotherapy and those from observation alone (interaction p<0.001). Furthermore, the high-/low-risk groups defined by the multimodal nomogram provided refined stratification of candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy identified by current guidelines (p<0.001). Gene set enrichment analyses using the NSCLC Radiogenomics dataset revealed associations between tumor/peritumor scores and pathways involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, IL6-JAK-STAT3 signaling, and reactive oxidative species.Conclusion The multimodal nomogram, which incorporates tumor and peritumor morphology with anti-tumor immune response, provides superior prognostic accuracy compared with unimodal scores. Its defined adjuvant chemotherapy benefit rates can inform individualized adjuvant therapy decisions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2051-1426 |