A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures”
Critical analysis of scientific productions highlights the strengths and weaknesses of authors and avoids the weaknesses. Achieving the desired perfection in the compilation of academic resources is possible after explicit and constructive criticism. In this article, “Scientific Research, Its Founda...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6347_60c002783387b88e4e98404b35d17738.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555305939337216 |
|---|---|
| author | Sadeq Askari |
| author_facet | Sadeq Askari |
| author_sort | Sadeq Askari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Critical analysis of scientific productions highlights the strengths and weaknesses of authors and avoids the weaknesses. Achieving the desired perfection in the compilation of academic resources is possible after explicit and constructive criticism. In this article, “Scientific Research, Its Foundations, Methods and Principles, Procedures”, written by Mostafa Robhi Alianhas, been criticized. The results of the critique and review of this book show that this book, despite some strengths such as the use of many and varied sources, the use of exercises and tables and diagrams that have played an effective role in explaining and teaching concepts, however, have many defects in the field of form and content, unfortunately. The most important formal defects include lack of strict observance of general rules of writing, interpretive and syntactic errors due to incorrect use of words and combinations, lack of formal comprehensiveness due to lack of introduction and methodical conclusion. The most important content shortcomings include repetition of the subject, incomplete arrangement and chaptering, superficial and hasty review, reliance on compilation and collection, and as a result, lack of critique and innovation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3b0a4043db1c43e6ab3565c459004afe |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-3b0a4043db1c43e6ab3565c459004afe2025-01-08T05:43:13ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502021-04-0121227329710.30465/crtls.2020.31130.18606347A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures”Sadeq Askari0Associate Professor, Semnan University, IranCritical analysis of scientific productions highlights the strengths and weaknesses of authors and avoids the weaknesses. Achieving the desired perfection in the compilation of academic resources is possible after explicit and constructive criticism. In this article, “Scientific Research, Its Foundations, Methods and Principles, Procedures”, written by Mostafa Robhi Alianhas, been criticized. The results of the critique and review of this book show that this book, despite some strengths such as the use of many and varied sources, the use of exercises and tables and diagrams that have played an effective role in explaining and teaching concepts, however, have many defects in the field of form and content, unfortunately. The most important formal defects include lack of strict observance of general rules of writing, interpretive and syntactic errors due to incorrect use of words and combinations, lack of formal comprehensiveness due to lack of introduction and methodical conclusion. The most important content shortcomings include repetition of the subject, incomplete arrangement and chaptering, superficial and hasty review, reliance on compilation and collection, and as a result, lack of critique and innovation.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6347_60c002783387b88e4e98404b35d17738.pdfscientific researchmostafa alianmethods and proceduresbook review |
| spellingShingle | Sadeq Askari A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی scientific research mostafa alian methods and procedures book review |
| title | A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” |
| title_full | A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” |
| title_fullStr | A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” |
| title_short | A Critical Review of the Book “Scientific Research; Bases, Methods and Principles, Procedures” |
| title_sort | critical review of the book scientific research bases methods and principles procedures |
| topic | scientific research mostafa alian methods and procedures book review |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6347_60c002783387b88e4e98404b35d17738.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sadeqaskari acriticalreviewofthebookscientificresearchbasesmethodsandprinciplesprocedures AT sadeqaskari criticalreviewofthebookscientificresearchbasesmethodsandprinciplesprocedures |