Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the survival rate of implants installed in bone type IV (Lekholm and Zarb, 1995) compared to that of implants installed in bone types I, II, and III. Material and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002717 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849304923012857856 |
|---|---|
| author | Cleber Rosa Victor Bento Nathália Duarte Joao Sayeg Thawan Santos Eduardo Pellizzer |
| author_facet | Cleber Rosa Victor Bento Nathália Duarte Joao Sayeg Thawan Santos Eduardo Pellizzer |
| author_sort | Cleber Rosa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the survival rate of implants installed in bone type IV (Lekholm and Zarb, 1995) compared to that of implants installed in bone types I, II, and III. Material and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and was registered in the PROSPERO International Database of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021229775). The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched through July 2021. The PICO question was: “Dental implants installed in type IV bone have a lower success rate when compared to implants installed in type I bone, II and III?”. The established inclusion criteria were: 1) controlled and randomized clinical trials (RCT), 2) prospective and retrospective studies with at least 10 participants with dental implants, and 3) patients with dental implants installed in bone tissue types I, II, III, and IV (Lekholm and Zarb, 1985). The minimum followup duration was 1 year. Results: After searching the identified databases, 117 articles were selected for full reading and 68 were excluded. Thus, 49 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The total number of participants included was 12,056, with a mean age of 41.56 years and 29,905 implants installed. Bone types I, II, and III exhibit a lower implant failure rate when compared to bone type IV. Conclusion: Dental implants installed in bone types I, II, and III showed significantly higher survival rates than those installed in type IV. The bone type I success rate was not significantly different than that of type II; however, the success rate of bone type I and II was higher than that of type III. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3afadbb5afb1491db7ccbce16868b406 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1013-9052 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Saudi Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-3afadbb5afb1491db7ccbce16868b4062025-08-20T03:55:36ZengSpringerSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522024-03-0136342844210.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.007Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysisCleber Rosa0Victor Bento1Nathália Duarte2Joao Sayeg3Thawan Santos4Eduardo Pellizzer5Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Corresponding author at: Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, 1193 Jose Bonifacio St – Centro, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Basic Sciences, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, BrazilPurpose: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the survival rate of implants installed in bone type IV (Lekholm and Zarb, 1995) compared to that of implants installed in bone types I, II, and III. Material and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and was registered in the PROSPERO International Database of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021229775). The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched through July 2021. The PICO question was: “Dental implants installed in type IV bone have a lower success rate when compared to implants installed in type I bone, II and III?”. The established inclusion criteria were: 1) controlled and randomized clinical trials (RCT), 2) prospective and retrospective studies with at least 10 participants with dental implants, and 3) patients with dental implants installed in bone tissue types I, II, III, and IV (Lekholm and Zarb, 1985). The minimum followup duration was 1 year. Results: After searching the identified databases, 117 articles were selected for full reading and 68 were excluded. Thus, 49 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The total number of participants included was 12,056, with a mean age of 41.56 years and 29,905 implants installed. Bone types I, II, and III exhibit a lower implant failure rate when compared to bone type IV. Conclusion: Dental implants installed in bone types I, II, and III showed significantly higher survival rates than those installed in type IV. The bone type I success rate was not significantly different than that of type II; however, the success rate of bone type I and II was higher than that of type III.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002717Dental implantsBone typeBone qualitySurvival rateSystematic review |
| spellingShingle | Cleber Rosa Victor Bento Nathália Duarte Joao Sayeg Thawan Santos Eduardo Pellizzer Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis Saudi Dental Journal Dental implants Bone type Bone quality Survival rate Systematic review |
| title | Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | do dental implants installed in different types of bone i ii iii iv have different success rates a systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | Dental implants Bone type Bone quality Survival rate Systematic review |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002717 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cleberrosa dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT victorbento dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nathaliaduarte dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT joaosayeg dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thawansantos dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eduardopellizzer dodentalimplantsinstalledindifferenttypesofboneiiiiiiivhavedifferentsuccessratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |