The Conciliatory View in Peer Disagreement and the Problem of Highly Justified Beliefs
Peer disagreement refers to subjects who are epistemically equivalent or accept being equivalent to each other who then adopt opposing beliefs based on the same evidence. Which epistemic attitude is rational is debatable in the face of sucha conflict. According to the conciliatory approach, the rati...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Nusret Erdi Elmacı |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Istanbul University Press
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Felsefe Arkivi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/08336D9D419345B4B063D3EF1B972949 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Family Mediation in Turkish Legal History from Mecelle to Present: An Analysis in the Context of Conciliatory Justice Theory
by: Muhammed Mansur Karadağ
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Coordination of contexts and taste disagreements
by: David Bordonaba Plou
Published: (2020-03-01) -
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking
by: Remco Heesen, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
What are Deep Disagreements?
by: gustavo javier arroyo
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The impacts of expertise, conflict, and scientific literacy on trust and belief in scientific disagreements
by: Natasha van Antwerpen, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)