Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes

Background In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thanawin Wong, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Nisa Netinatsunton, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Thanapon Yaowmaneerat, Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Siriboon Attasaranya, Pimsiri Sripongpun, Naichaya Chamroonkul, Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862143263440896
author Thanawin Wong
Tanawat Pattarapuntakul
Nisa Netinatsunton
Jaksin Sottisuporn
Thanapon Yaowmaneerat
Wongsakorn Chaochankit
Siriboon Attasaranya
Pimsiri Sripongpun
Naichaya Chamroonkul
Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
author_facet Thanawin Wong
Tanawat Pattarapuntakul
Nisa Netinatsunton
Jaksin Sottisuporn
Thanapon Yaowmaneerat
Wongsakorn Chaochankit
Siriboon Attasaranya
Pimsiri Sripongpun
Naichaya Chamroonkul
Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
author_sort Thanawin Wong
collection DOAJ
description Background In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a concern. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and outcomes associated with SEMS as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) compared to direct emergency surgery (ES) in patients with acute MCO. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including patients with potentially curable obstructed colon cancer who were treated with either SBTS or ES at a university hospital in Thailand from 2015 to 2022. We compared OS, 5-year OS rate, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative morbidity, and complications between the SBTS and the ES groups. Results A total of 106 patients were eligible, 29 underwent SBTS, and 77 underwent ES. Baseline characteristics were similar except for ASA classification and chemotherapy rates. The median OS was 56.1 months, with no significant differences in OS (51.4 vs. 61.0 months, p = 0.67) or 5-year DFS (53.8% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.32) between the two groups. The SBTS group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (65.5% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative stays (POS) (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.026). Stage IV cancer and low serum albumin were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery had no significant impact on OS compared to ES, but it was associated with shorter hospital stays and higher rates of MIS.
format Article
id doaj-art-3ad0500e9f314cb5b77f356e8e8ca4e3
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-230X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-3ad0500e9f314cb5b77f356e8e8ca4e32025-02-09T12:39:41ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2025-02-012511910.1186/s12876-025-03654-zStent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomesThanawin Wong0Tanawat Pattarapuntakul1Nisa Netinatsunton2Jaksin Sottisuporn3Thanapon Yaowmaneerat4Wongsakorn Chaochankit5Siriboon Attasaranya6Pimsiri Sripongpun7Naichaya Chamroonkul8Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong9Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityBackground In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a concern. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and outcomes associated with SEMS as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) compared to direct emergency surgery (ES) in patients with acute MCO. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including patients with potentially curable obstructed colon cancer who were treated with either SBTS or ES at a university hospital in Thailand from 2015 to 2022. We compared OS, 5-year OS rate, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative morbidity, and complications between the SBTS and the ES groups. Results A total of 106 patients were eligible, 29 underwent SBTS, and 77 underwent ES. Baseline characteristics were similar except for ASA classification and chemotherapy rates. The median OS was 56.1 months, with no significant differences in OS (51.4 vs. 61.0 months, p = 0.67) or 5-year DFS (53.8% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.32) between the two groups. The SBTS group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (65.5% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative stays (POS) (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.026). Stage IV cancer and low serum albumin were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery had no significant impact on OS compared to ES, but it was associated with shorter hospital stays and higher rates of MIS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-zMalignant colonic obstructionSelf-expandable metallic stentBridge to surgery
spellingShingle Thanawin Wong
Tanawat Pattarapuntakul
Nisa Netinatsunton
Jaksin Sottisuporn
Thanapon Yaowmaneerat
Wongsakorn Chaochankit
Siriboon Attasaranya
Pimsiri Sripongpun
Naichaya Chamroonkul
Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
BMC Gastroenterology
Malignant colonic obstruction
Self-expandable metallic stent
Bridge to surgery
title Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
title_full Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
title_fullStr Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
title_short Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
title_sort stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
topic Malignant colonic obstruction
Self-expandable metallic stent
Bridge to surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-z
work_keys_str_mv AT thanawinwong stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT tanawatpattarapuntakul stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT nisanetinatsunton stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT jaksinsottisuporn stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT thanaponyaowmaneerat stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT wongsakornchaochankit stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT siriboonattasaranya stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT pimsirisripongpun stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT naichayachamroonkul stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes
AT viraksakdichongsuvivatwong stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes