Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
Background In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Gastroenterology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-z |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823862143263440896 |
---|---|
author | Thanawin Wong Tanawat Pattarapuntakul Nisa Netinatsunton Jaksin Sottisuporn Thanapon Yaowmaneerat Wongsakorn Chaochankit Siriboon Attasaranya Pimsiri Sripongpun Naichaya Chamroonkul Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong |
author_facet | Thanawin Wong Tanawat Pattarapuntakul Nisa Netinatsunton Jaksin Sottisuporn Thanapon Yaowmaneerat Wongsakorn Chaochankit Siriboon Attasaranya Pimsiri Sripongpun Naichaya Chamroonkul Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong |
author_sort | Thanawin Wong |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a concern. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and outcomes associated with SEMS as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) compared to direct emergency surgery (ES) in patients with acute MCO. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including patients with potentially curable obstructed colon cancer who were treated with either SBTS or ES at a university hospital in Thailand from 2015 to 2022. We compared OS, 5-year OS rate, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative morbidity, and complications between the SBTS and the ES groups. Results A total of 106 patients were eligible, 29 underwent SBTS, and 77 underwent ES. Baseline characteristics were similar except for ASA classification and chemotherapy rates. The median OS was 56.1 months, with no significant differences in OS (51.4 vs. 61.0 months, p = 0.67) or 5-year DFS (53.8% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.32) between the two groups. The SBTS group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (65.5% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative stays (POS) (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.026). Stage IV cancer and low serum albumin were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery had no significant impact on OS compared to ES, but it was associated with shorter hospital stays and higher rates of MIS. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-3ad0500e9f314cb5b77f356e8e8ca4e3 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1471-230X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Gastroenterology |
spelling | doaj-art-3ad0500e9f314cb5b77f356e8e8ca4e32025-02-09T12:39:41ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2025-02-012511910.1186/s12876-025-03654-zStent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomesThanawin Wong0Tanawat Pattarapuntakul1Nisa Netinatsunton2Jaksin Sottisuporn3Thanapon Yaowmaneerat4Wongsakorn Chaochankit5Siriboon Attasaranya6Pimsiri Sripongpun7Naichaya Chamroonkul8Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong9Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityBackground In cases of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes remain debated, particularly in developing countries where the cost of SEMS is a concern. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and outcomes associated with SEMS as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) compared to direct emergency surgery (ES) in patients with acute MCO. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including patients with potentially curable obstructed colon cancer who were treated with either SBTS or ES at a university hospital in Thailand from 2015 to 2022. We compared OS, 5-year OS rate, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative morbidity, and complications between the SBTS and the ES groups. Results A total of 106 patients were eligible, 29 underwent SBTS, and 77 underwent ES. Baseline characteristics were similar except for ASA classification and chemotherapy rates. The median OS was 56.1 months, with no significant differences in OS (51.4 vs. 61.0 months, p = 0.67) or 5-year DFS (53.8% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.32) between the two groups. The SBTS group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (65.5% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative stays (POS) (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.026). Stage IV cancer and low serum albumin were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery had no significant impact on OS compared to ES, but it was associated with shorter hospital stays and higher rates of MIS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-zMalignant colonic obstructionSelf-expandable metallic stentBridge to surgery |
spellingShingle | Thanawin Wong Tanawat Pattarapuntakul Nisa Netinatsunton Jaksin Sottisuporn Thanapon Yaowmaneerat Wongsakorn Chaochankit Siriboon Attasaranya Pimsiri Sripongpun Naichaya Chamroonkul Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes BMC Gastroenterology Malignant colonic obstruction Self-expandable metallic stent Bridge to surgery |
title | Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
title_full | Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
title_short | Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
title_sort | stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction a retrospective study on survival and outcomes |
topic | Malignant colonic obstruction Self-expandable metallic stent Bridge to surgery |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03654-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thanawinwong stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT tanawatpattarapuntakul stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT nisanetinatsunton stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT jaksinsottisuporn stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT thanaponyaowmaneerat stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT wongsakornchaochankit stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT siriboonattasaranya stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT pimsirisripongpun stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT naichayachamroonkul stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes AT viraksakdichongsuvivatwong stentasabridgetosurgeryformalignantcolonicobstructionaretrospectivestudyonsurvivalandoutcomes |