Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203

This paper examines the alignment of the Republic of Serbia's criminal legislation with EU Environmental Crime Directive 2024/1203. Although the Directive does not specifically address animal protection, several criminal offenses EU member states are required to enforce directly involve the pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bajović Vanja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bar Association of Vojvodina, Novi Sad 2024-01-01
Series:Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0017-0933/2024/0017-09332404132B.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850225219424223232
author Bajović Vanja
author_facet Bajović Vanja
author_sort Bajović Vanja
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines the alignment of the Republic of Serbia's criminal legislation with EU Environmental Crime Directive 2024/1203. Although the Directive does not specifically address animal protection, several criminal offenses EU member states are required to enforce directly involve the protection of wild animal species. Member states are thus required to impose strict penalties for actions such as killing, destroying, possessing, buying, selling, offering for sale, importing, exporting, or unlawfully trading these species or their derivatives. In the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, these actions can be classified under various criminal offenses and misdemeanors, often aimed at primarily safeguarding the economy, market, customs system, and similar interests rather than nature itself. Based on the premise that the current legal framework is insufficient to provide animals with adequate protection, the paper analyzes existing criminal provisions related to animal protection and assesses their alignment with the Directive. The paper also addresses several controversial theoretical questions, such as whether animals can even be recognized as subjects of criminal law protection, whether they can be granted legal personhood, and whether it is appropriate to classify them as movable property or "goods" in the eyes of the law. Finally, it examines the problematic relationship between criminal offenses and misdemeanors in this area, where overlapping legal definitions pose a risk that initiating misdemeanor proceedings and imposing misdemeanor penalties could, in fact, shield offenders from criminal liability.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a7f2255180844cba295dfda8919079a
institution OA Journals
issn 0017-0933
2683-5967
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Bar Association of Vojvodina, Novi Sad
record_format Article
series Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
spelling doaj-art-3a7f2255180844cba295dfda8919079a2025-08-20T02:05:25ZengBar Association of Vojvodina, Novi SadGlasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine0017-09332683-59672024-01-019641104116010.5937/gakv96-574780017-09332404132BCriminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203Bajović Vanja0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-725XUniverzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, SerbiaThis paper examines the alignment of the Republic of Serbia's criminal legislation with EU Environmental Crime Directive 2024/1203. Although the Directive does not specifically address animal protection, several criminal offenses EU member states are required to enforce directly involve the protection of wild animal species. Member states are thus required to impose strict penalties for actions such as killing, destroying, possessing, buying, selling, offering for sale, importing, exporting, or unlawfully trading these species or their derivatives. In the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, these actions can be classified under various criminal offenses and misdemeanors, often aimed at primarily safeguarding the economy, market, customs system, and similar interests rather than nature itself. Based on the premise that the current legal framework is insufficient to provide animals with adequate protection, the paper analyzes existing criminal provisions related to animal protection and assesses their alignment with the Directive. The paper also addresses several controversial theoretical questions, such as whether animals can even be recognized as subjects of criminal law protection, whether they can be granted legal personhood, and whether it is appropriate to classify them as movable property or "goods" in the eyes of the law. Finally, it examines the problematic relationship between criminal offenses and misdemeanors in this area, where overlapping legal definitions pose a risk that initiating misdemeanor proceedings and imposing misdemeanor penalties could, in fact, shield offenders from criminal liability.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0017-0933/2024/0017-09332404132B.pdfwildlife crimeseu directive 2024/1203legal personhoodcriminal offensesmisdemeanors
spellingShingle Bajović Vanja
Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
wildlife crimes
eu directive 2024/1203
legal personhood
criminal offenses
misdemeanors
title Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
title_full Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
title_fullStr Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
title_full_unstemmed Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
title_short Criminal law protection of animals in light of EU directive 2024/1203
title_sort criminal law protection of animals in light of eu directive 2024 1203
topic wildlife crimes
eu directive 2024/1203
legal personhood
criminal offenses
misdemeanors
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0017-0933/2024/0017-09332404132B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bajovicvanja criminallawprotectionofanimalsinlightofeudirective20241203