Phylogenomic Analysis of Wide‐Ranging Least Shrews Refines Conservation Priorities and Supports a Paradigm for Evolution of Biota Spanning Eastern North America and Mesoamerica
ABSTRACT Anthropogenic global change is impacting the evolutionary potential of biodiversity in ways that have been difficult to predict. Distinct evolutionary units within species may respond differently to the same environmental trends, reflecting unique geography, ecology, adaptation, or drift. L...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71263 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ABSTRACT Anthropogenic global change is impacting the evolutionary potential of biodiversity in ways that have been difficult to predict. Distinct evolutionary units within species may respond differently to the same environmental trends, reflecting unique geography, ecology, adaptation, or drift. Least shrews (Cryptotis parvus group) have a widespread distribution across North America, yet systematic relationships and ongoing evolutionary processes remain unresolved. Westernmost peripheral populations have been prioritized for conservation, but little is known of their evolutionary histories or population trajectories. The broad range of this group of species is coincident with many other temperate taxa, presenting a hypothesis that diversification of least shrews follows a repeated process through the Pleistocene, leading to regionally diagnosable conservation units. We use genomic data and niche modeling to delimit species and conservation units of least shrews. Our results show that least shrews warrant recognition as multiple distinct species, along with geographically discrete infraspecific lineages of C. parvus (sensu stricto). Western peripheral populations are evolutionarily distinct based on nuclear, but not mitochondrial data, possibly reflecting mitochondrial capture during the last glacial phase. This population represents a relict conservation unit, consistent with both an “adaptive unit” and “management unit” based on non‐neutral and neutral divergence, respectively. Hindcast niche modeling supports growing evidence for a shared process of diversification among co‐distributed biota, and forecast modeling suggests continued future loss of suitable environmental niche in peripheral regions. Given mito‐nuclear discordance among samples of parapatric lineages, future environmental perturbation may continue to impact the genomic integrity of important conservation units, making ecological and genomic monitoring a critical need. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-7758 |